The petition is open to all EU resident. The goal is to replace all Windows in all public institution in Europe with a sovereign GNU/Linux.

If the petition is successful it would be a huge step forward for GNU/Linux adoption.

  • bustAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    My main worry with Linux becoming more popular is that it will be attacked with more malware and viruses. I wouldn’t mind though if Linux programmers could come up with better protection.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 month ago

        The insecure parts of Linux is mostly on the DE side opposed to the core OS part that servers use. We absolutely will see more vulnerabilities in the future as Linux grows.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Many developments over the last few years have been for improving those aspects, e.g. Wayland is far more secure than X11 could ever be. There will be more vulnerabilities found, but it won’t be as bad as one might fear.

          • Vilian@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Flatpak too, they could force more filesystem restrictions tho, line Android apps

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Wayland takes a lot of abuse but it is a great example of what is great about FOSS. Completely proprietary software could never abide that level of disruption.

            If being driven by a minor player, it is just too hard and too risky. A commercial player with the economic dominance to pull it off would never see enough financial benefit to bother.

            Take Windows. Even though modern Windows is from the “New Technology” branch of the Windows family, the security model was flawed with all users commonly running as Admin. Instead of really changing that, they have introduced a couple layers of duct tape ( eg. UAC ) but not fundamentally fixed it.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          What vulnerabilities are you talking about? Linux is pretty solid especially with wayland and flatpaks.

          Throw in some other tools like mandatory access controls and you are set

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Linux-based OSes are less uniform than Windows. They could and probably will be targeted, but exploits won’t spread because of how many verities they are and how different and incompatible they can be. Some, for example, don’t even use the GNU utils and userland.

      • pound_heap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        This petition is for developing something dubbed “EU-Linux”, so if implemented as is will be pretty uniform

      • gens@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        That is mostly false. Most of the code that faces the network is the same. As is most of the background running code. Linux is still more secure.