• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That is one technology that I don’t care if China steals secrets to make it happen faster.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      No need!

      The data gathered by EAST will support the development of other reactors, both in China and internationally. China is part of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) program, which involves dozens of countries, including the U.S., U.K. Japan, South Korea and Russia.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          Is the argument here that China isn’t worthy of the United States’ cooperation? We here in the US need to get over ourselves and stop acting as if we have the moral high ground over everyone else. There are a lot of things about the US that are far from humane, and we do cooperate with countries that engage in far worse, often on our behalf. Our adversarial disposition towards China has nothing to do with human rights and everything to do with geopolitics.

        • BigBenis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          More like if they were willing to embrace capitalistic western values and bend over for America whenever we’re feeling frisky

          • eric5949@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Thinking that china isn’t capitalist just because the ruling party has communist in the name is funny

            • BigBenis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Never said they weren’t. Just that it doesn’t align with capitalistic western values.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            To clarify, what you’re doing is “what-aboutism”. Asking China to be more humane is not a comment on anything but China being more humane.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              52 minutes ago

              They weren’t just asking China to be more humane, though. They were suggesting that China doesn’t deserve our cooperation because they are inhumane, which implies we have the moral high ground and is explicitly hypocritical. It isn’t whataboutism to point out hypocrisy.

        • XNX@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Yeah more humane like Israel… America has been installing dictators all around the world for decades what are you talking about? You think America cares about humanity? You cant even birth a child without a $10,000+ bill.

          America cares about moneyyyyy and nothing more

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            We topple democratically-elected leaders because it suits our economic plans. People downvoting the above comment don’t know shit about history. And that’s because our schools don’t accurately teach it.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      23 hours ago

      im pretty sure almost unilaterally, every country would like the solution to near infinite energy regardless. its extremely vital if as a species, ever want to start a colony outside of earth.

      the only people against it would be those in the pocket of other forms of energy monetary wise.