Yeah the way I phrased it was super awkward
Yeah the way I phrased it was super awkward
Safari is WebKit, which branched off from Chrome when Google forked WebKit into Blink. So they’re like siblings.
The “limited fashion choices for a man to wear” was enforced by men, not women. It’s not the slam dunk argument you seem to think it is. (Especially considering during the same era women couldn’t own property or vote.) Men have had privilege for nearly all of recorded history.
I know you’re just doubling down on your argument here, which is a normal human thing. You should really read up on the topic and see what experts say about sexism. There are lots of good citations in the Wikipedia article here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism
Both those things can be true. One is caused by sexism, the other by classism. Neither negates the other, and implying so is incredibly dismissive.
I agree with you in principle. Legally, the courts are still deciding.
I think the next step in AI is learning how to control and direct the speech, rather than just make computers talk.
They are surprisingly good for being a mere statistical copycat of words on the internet. Whatever the second tier innovation is that jumps AI into true reasoning rather than pattern matching is going to be wild.
If you get killed by a robot, it simply lacks the human touch.
I guess you could think this while in a shower.
I agree that it’s probably not illegal for him to do that. But it is solvable if we decide to legislate some long overdue guardrails.
When I became atheist, I figured “if God doesn’t exist, we’ll have to make heaven ourselves.”
And I believe we’ll do it, given enough time (probably hundreds/thousands of years).
As long as it doesn’t generate any negative externalities, sure. That’s a huge alignment problem though.
I’m not so sure about that. When we compare medieval wealth inequality to now, it was worse back then. Ew, a link to Reddit, but it’s got good info.
Not saying we don’t need to fix things… we need to destroy even the concept of billionaires. While things are bad, and trending worse, they’re not yet “literally eat the rich” bad.
ODDTAXI is an absolutely amazing show. It feels slow and chill, yet it’s really gripping.
The writing is phenomenal! Every detail matters, even little stuff like “what pen is that guy writing with?”
Daaaang, Apache license AND open dataset + training tools.
Or at work, or only need to charge once a week, or something similar.
It’s certainly longer and less convenient, but greatly offset by the fact I can almost always charge at home. Only on days where I drive more than a couple hundred miles (very rarely) do I need a charging station.
Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.
It can be? You literally just download the OTA update and the vehicle installs it from your own home. “Recall” implies that you have to go into the shop but that’s simply not true.
I don’t think “the backup camera is a little slow to turn on” is the smoking gun you are looking for though.
They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.
Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.