• fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ubuntu no longer supplies value over Debian. Made the switch and can barely tell the difference. And no snaps.

  • mesamunefire@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 days ago

    Man I used to love Ubuntu. Then snaps…and it broke a lot of things. Now I’m on other oses. But I appreciate what they did to the Debian flavors of distos.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    At those times I swear, I have a knack for avoiding problems before they appear.

    Some years ago I migrated from Ubuntu to Debian. It was due to something silly, like defaults. Then I got pissed with Debian Stable, went to Testing, got pissed again… and for some reason instead of going back to Ubuntu I gave Mint a try.

    Then people started talking about snaps a lot, and I gave them a try in Mint. This was in a potato computer so I could clearly notice how slow they were to start. Nope.

    Then Ubuntu started forcing them every where, but by then I could simply say “Not My Problem®”. Mint maintainers are clearly against snaps, and I’m happy with it.

    Glad to see Õunapuu also found a way to handle the problem by changing distros. I’m too deep into the APT rabbit hole to get used to Fedora, but it seems like a good choice regardless.

  • ikt@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    ubuntu is so popular when you stop using it you get to write a blog post

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      It really isn’t all that popular these days. It is running on the fumes of history like Windows is. The difference is there is little reason to stay with Ubuntu since it is just Linux.

      • ikt@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It really isn’t all that popular these days

        It’s popular amongst regular linux users, I mean if I was to take your opinion seriously then someone clearly made a mistake here:

        https://survey.stackoverflow.co/2024/technology#1-operating-system

        Someone put Ubuntu in 3rd (after Mac and Windows) and Fedora in 12th under ipadOS and “Other linux based” 🧐

        In terms of popularity amongst neckbeards who argue over linux distros then yeah, Ubuntu isn’t that popular you’re right

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          The stack overflow survey only captures a small portion of the population. It is going to be mostly corporate software development companies.

          Ubuntu is still fairly common in the enterprise when it is required by corporate overlords but it is way less popular when users are given a choice. Ubuntu doesn’t have much to offer these days and it is riding on inertia.

          • pixelpop3@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I have a general philosophy of reinstalling my systems from scratch every few months and honestly Ubuntu is among the easiest for that (Debian is close second, but corporate overlords freak the hell out)

          • ikt@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Ok so you have no penetration in the corporate environment

            SteamOS for Jan 2025 shows Arch with 9.41% and Ubuntu with 8.97%, so gamers are using it

            Wikipedia shows it with as the only distro with a pulse

            some pretty strong fumes eh?

  • Jediwan@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    LOL this is me. Bonus points for the immuteable versions. The first truly desktop linux that “just works” and dare I say improves over windows in basically every way.

  • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m in the process of switching from Ubuntu/Mint to Fedora. I’m trying it on my laptop first; if that goes well, I’ve got 2 others to switch over.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    I was about to install Ubuntu, which I’ve used before, but decided to try out Mint. About to throw the switch right now in fact. Hope it’s a good decision.

    • Twotone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Mint is great. I’ve been using it as my daily since mid last year after ditching windows.

  • logging_strict@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    i ditched Ubuntu for Void Linux LXDE. Void Linux has runit rather than systemd

    This predates snapd

    Disclaimer: you have to setup the wifi and enable logind

      • logging_strict@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There is lots of complexity creep. And i’m one person with a finite lifespan. So had to decide what to spend time on.

        systemd is ideal for those running servers. I’m publishing Python packages and wanted to keep focused on that.

        If you wish to work for me for free, cuz i have zero access to labor or funding, to upgrade my tech infrastructure, i could be a useful person to know.

        Especially if you believe strongly i should be running much better infrastructure.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Systemd makes life easier though. Everything is automatic and chances are all you need to to is run systemctl commands. If there is a problem you can filter logs with journalctl.

          If your setup works that’s good but from my perspective systemd sounds easier. I also started using Linux around the time systemd was adopted so that’s probably why is seems easier for me.

          • logging_strict@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            so does zfs, so does wayland, so does trying out every distro, so does trying out every text editor and associated plugins, so does trying out ventoy, so does GrapheneOS, …

            Everything makes life easier, but comes down to,

            Linux isn't free, it costs you your time

            Which can be reframed, what do you really want to spend your time on?

            If i really really really had to answer that overly honestly, want:

            • my GUI apps non-blocking on heavy background processes

            • distributing out tasks to many computers and runners

            None of which screams or necessitates systemd or zfs or wayland or trying out every distro, every text editor every plugin, ventoy, or GrapheneOS.

            Not in a house with a fox with a crow and a bow a knot on a cot or relaxed in the snow, i will not eat never ending random suggestions Sam, i will never eat them Sam i am.

  • not3ottersinacoat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    As much as I dislike Ubuntu, I wouldn’t use Fedora, sponsored by Red Hat, a US company, either. LMDE is the way.

      • not3ottersinacoat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Amongst others, yes. But not every distro is red hat’s testing ground, and not every distro operates under US jurisdiction. I’m sure you do actually know the difference.

    • PokerChips@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Is not Fedora independent of red hat?

      Except for the upstream (or downstream since they are bleeding edge) development, I always assume they are isolated from red hat influence.

      • Metju@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Iirc, a crapton of RH ppl work on Fedora, since it’s their “sandbox for RHEL” distro.

        And while I fuckin’ HATE what IBM/RH BS tries to pull in some areas, it doesn’t prevent me from running Fedora derivatives daily.