cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1353arrow-down17
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·22 hours ago until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·9 hours agoThe idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·21 hours agoWith quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.