• brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    I am against all game design patents in general. You shouldn’t be able to file a patent on game mechanics, like no movie director could have filed a patent on, say, the idea of sequence shot.

    Game content (art, characters, etc) is already protected by copyright. Patents have absolutely no business in this.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      25 days ago

      Wholly agreed. In general the concept that “you can’t patent an idea” or “you can’t patent a general concept” is supposed to be at the heart of patent law. I think some of these game mechanics parents, like this and the Nemesis System, go against that too much.

    • Xenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      No sorry, you can’t paint like that. I patented left to right brush strokes.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        If you invented a new and novel method of painting, like Jackson Pollock’s, you could potentially patent that. Directionally brushing has imperial buttloads of prior literal art.

        • Xenny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 days ago

          Nah fuck that I should be able to splatter paint and call it my work as well.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      25 days ago

      Sure we all agree but the dumbshits making the rules 1) Have no idea about technology older than color television and 2) Are really only interested in preserving corporate profitability