Range

  • Small battery range: 240km
  • Big battery range: 385km

Motor

  • Motor: Single motor, rear wheel drive
  • Power: 150kW
  • Torque: 264Nm
  • 0-100km: 8s
  • Top speed: 145km/h

Dimensions

  • Bed length: 1.5m
  • Vehicle length: 4.4m
  • Vehicle height: 1.8m
  • Vehicle width: 1.8m

Comparison

  • 2025 Kia Niro length: 4.4m
  • 2025 Ford Maverick length: 5.1m
  • 1985 Toyota Pickup/Hilux length: 4.7m

Weights

  • Curb weight 1634kg
  • Max payload 650kg
  • Max towing 454kg

Charging

  • Port: NACS
  • Onboard charger: 11kW
  • Level 1 AC, 3.6kw, 20-100%: 11h
  • Level 2 AC, 11kW, 20-100%: under 5h
  • Level 3 DC, 120kW, 20-80%: under 30m

Safety

  • Traction Control
  • Electronic Stability Control
  • Forward Collision Warning
  • Automatic Emergency Braking
  • 2-stage Driver/Passenger Airbags
  • Full Length Side Curtain Airbags (Truck 2) (SUV 4)
  • Seat Side Airbags (2)
  • Backup Camera
  • Pedestrian Identification
  • Auto High Beam

More info

        • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Every news website is covering it. I think I’ve spotted most of 10 articles around the place.

          The law of well-marketed unreleased goods dictates that this vehicle is not going to meet any of the promises mentioned in the articles. I hope to be proven wrong, but just like video games: don’t pre-order, wait for it to come out and be reviewed.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    Aside from being backed by Bezos, this seems like Lemmy the car. Under 20K, an EV, no stupid touch screen, designed to be repaired and modded, and even crank windows.

    I bet the catch, aside from Bezos, is the range or charge speed.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I don’t think that it has a cell modem, either, because it sounds like it eschews a baked-in entertainment computer:

      https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a64564869/2027-slate-truck-revealed/

      Roll-down windows come standard, as do manually adjustable rearview mirrors. An audio or infotainment system is noticeably missing, too. Instead, your cellphone or tablet serves these functions, with a dock for the former included and one for the latter available as an optional accessory. Better like the sound coming out from your phone or tablet’s speakers, too, because the Slate lacks speakers, though the brand’s accessory division will gladly hook you up with a set.

      Honestly, if you took my last year of comments complaining about privacy-infringing cars and those complaining about changes to what a truck is, this does kind of look to be addressing both. Gotta see what the actual production vehicle is like in real life, of course, but…

      https://cars.usnews.com/cars-trucks/advice/mini-truckin-returns-slate-unveils-old-school-style-affordable-electric-pickup

      When I say the truck is small, I mean it. At 174.6 inches, it’s about 2 feet shorter in overall length than the 2025 Ford Maverick and Hyundai Santa Cruz. And to use the Wayback Machine to a time when compact pickups were actually compact, it’s roughly the same size as the compact pickups of 1980: the Toyota truck, Chevy LUV and Ford Courier. Notably, no other automakers have offered trucks of this size in America since the mid 1990s.

      Yeah, like the “inexpensive, no-frills utility vehicle” that pickups originally were.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        because the Slate lacks speakers,

        I mean, I get they need to cut costs, but come on… a damn radio wouldnt have killed them

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Honestly, as long as it’s easily DIY upgradable (accessible speaker mounting locations, standard DIN panels, etc) I am all for this. Most OEM audio systems are stupidly overpriced and suck complete donkey balls compared to what you can get for a few hundred bucks at Crutchfield and install in an afternoon.

          For the last 20 years or so, most factory audio systems are so integrated into the rest of the electronics that they can be an absolute nightmare to upgrade unless you are a pro, which means you get the worst of both worlds: garbage audio, AND a steep upgrade path.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          The Citroen AMI doesn’t have speakers either, it comes with a Bluetooth speaker instead, which you can use outside the car. It makes sense if you just think of the entertainment stuff as something that shouldn’t be part of the car and can easily be upgraded/replaced down the line.

          • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 days ago

            You spent hours in that thing and phone speakers are not made to be louder than traffic and drive noises, especially not for so long. Also a radio offers traffic and accident news from local stations. And if they cheap out on speakers I am quite sure they also don’t offer USB ports to charge the phone you run in lieu of a build in system

            • tal@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              I am quite sure they also don’t offer USB ports to charge the phone you run in lieu of a build in system

              I definitely read an article somewhere where it says that they provide USB power for the tablet/phone.

              kagis

              This article has it:

              https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a64580484/slate-truck-ev-pickup-truck-suv/

              The Truck will come with a phone mount and convenient USB power to mount your phone or a tablet to the dash.

              EDIT: I think that a better criticism is that this thing is just a prototype, still almost two years away from mass production, assuming everything goes right for them. Like, they could have any number of things go wrong (the Trump tariff situation, for one…hard to have any idea where things will be). It could be that they crash into problems trying to get mass production going. It could be that they can’t hit their target price point.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      As long as it gets 50+ miles range reliably in winter, it’s perfect as a commuter/weekend project truck. I generally look for 150 miles range for this, since winter can cut effective range in half. I don’t care about charge speed since I’ll just plug it in at night.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      well its less it doesnt have a touch screen, the touch screen is an optional purchase.

      the range iirc in some overview is 2 options, one was i think 150mi, the other was 240mi

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        From my other link, I don’t think that the touch screen is an optional purchase. I don’t think that they’re selling any entertainment computer to have a screen on. It says that they come standard with a smartphone mounting point or optionally with a tablet mounting point. But the car computer is bring-your-own, and not built into the car. Which…is what I’ve wanted, because computers age out a lot more quickly than cars do.

        I assume that there’ll be an OBD-II slot that one can hook up to to feed data about the car to the phone/tablet. There’s software that can make use of that. Dunno if there’s any other data typically exposed to car computers other than what that provides.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 days ago

    Everyone seems to hate this thing based on marketing but I actually kind of liked the looks of it, sigh.

    • Altrex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      Yeah, this is my issue with the government incentives for EVs, especially now that they are more common and can be deducted from the sale price. Most retailers are just jacking up the price to whatever the cap for the rebate is while pretending it’s still a good deal.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        This is the same argument used for blaming the cost of college on government loans for education, for $$$ housing prices in cities that offer low income subsidies, for food prices due to food stamps…

        • Altrex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 days ago

          Those programs do have an effect on pricing. Not 1 to 1 with the cost subsidization and even if it does there’s plenty of arguments to keep programs like that around.

          However I’d rather see moves made to encourage positive behaviors, like purchasing an electric vehicle, that didn’t translate into a dealership subsidy.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        I hardly think $27.5k could be considered “jacking up the price” but I also don’t appreciate advertising pricing that is dependent on a government incentive that may not even exist when the vehicles are actually delivered.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Something like this I imagine I’d be happy with. A sedan/crossover and this. Wouldn’t take it out the county. Just trips to hardware/gardening stores and moving furniture. More than enough range and speed to go to work too. Any long drive I’d probably get an Accord hybrid or something. 2 vehicle family

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Same. We have two cars and three kids. One needs to be comfortable for longer trips, camping, etc, and the other just needs to go to work and back. This would be perfect for the second, and double as a furniture, garden stuff , dump, etc hauler around town.

      I personally hate trucks, but this is in the price range and could be handy.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    150kWatt and a top speed of 145? That’s kind of insane?

    Wait a minute, mph not km/h I guess.

  • barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Sounds like the consumer version of the DHL StreetScooter Work (L), with those even the passenger seat is an optional extra. Trouble was that while it’s the perfect vehicle for last-mile distribution routes most companies doing that kind of thing (like bakeries) don’t have the finances to back up an actual car producer, and DHL didn’t want to become a car producer. Taking over the company to get their hands on the trucks, yes, but bringing it to scale so they wouldn’t have to subsidise it? Not their business. And German car manufactures don’t want to build it because small bare-bones vehicles don’t have margin, anything smaller and less fancy than an actual van doesn’t make sense to them given the fixed cost of their production lines. Don’t worry, though, the inventor got the rights back, production is moving to Thailand, new vehicle is in the pipeline, with the core components (chassis etc.) designed for a 50 year lifetime. I’m sure DHL will figure out how to deliver delivery vans.

  • MichaelScotch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    Toyota Tacoma didn’t exist in 1985. The first model year was 1995. Did you mean a 1985 toyota pickup/hilux?

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Please keep in mind that this is after tax incentives. So let’s just assume the tax incentives are zero and call it 27,000 just to be on the safe side.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    No mention of safety in the article. Does a manufacturer of this size have to do crash tests?

    Also, this sounds like the Spirit/Ryanair of cars. Everything costs extra.

    For years, I drove ~10-20 minutes to and from work. Mostly stroads and freeway. I could never justify buying an extra nice car because I didn’t use it that much. Same for a nice car stereo. I’d just listen to NPR and talk radio for news, traffic reports, and maybe a quirky story about some cultural oddity or eclectic artist. If I spend thousands on a sound system it goes in my house, where I live and vibe. Now I work from home, ride my bike everywhere, and a tank of gas can easily last me a month. My current car was purchased for about $20k. If my car died for some reason, I don’t even know if I’d be willing to part with 20k to replace it. I appreciate that these guys are building something for ordinary people and not another faux luxury lifted minivan the size of a garbage truck.

    I can see a lot of retired people buying one of these to drive to their once a week bridge tournament or bingo night.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      I can see a lot of retired people buying one of these to drive to their once a week bridge tournament or bingo night.

      They would be far better served with a regular car instead of a pickup

      • mnmalst@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        If you need a car just once a week you shouldn’t own a car at all. Take the bus!

  • ⛓️‍💥@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Very interesting, but please give me power windows and a dumb infotainment unit that does Android Auto/CarPlay. No Internet connection. No integration with the rest of the car.

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I struggle to understand the point of a truck that can only tow 500kg… that and such awful range. If the range were doubled this would be a great deal, but as is it’s just dead in the water.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      That’s because you’re thinking of trucks used first and foremost for heavy duty “truck stuff.” That is not the only market for trucks, at least in the US: https://www.thedrive.com/news/26907/you-dont-need-a-full-size-pickup-truck-you-need-a-cowboy-costume

      According to Edwards’ data, 75 percent of truck owners use their truck for towing one time a year or less (meaning, never). Nearly 70 percent of truck owners go off-road one time a year or less. And a full 35 percent of truck owners use their truck for hauling—putting something in the bed, its ostensible raison d’être—once a year or less.

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      $20k with some cargo for a car is pretty good. If you need a F150, then you’ll have to pay for one.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 days ago

        I mean, are there any cars available in the US for just $20k? I’m pretty sure a base Mazda 3 was more than that when we bought ours five years ago (before the pandemic, and ours is a higher trim model). I don’t think they’re making the really small cars any more (like the Toyota Yaris).

        Short version, I’m skeptical of this price point for even a small pickup. Great if they can do it.

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 days ago

      It can probably tow more, usually 500 kg is like the bare minimum for American cars. Also us towing standards are a bit more strict. A car in the EU is rated to tow more than a car in the US, even if it’s identical.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Even if it were 1000kg, that’s still way below what a truck would want to tow though.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Depends on the truck owner. It’s not going to haul a boat, but it can probably do lumber (though the bed is kinda short and narrow), gardening stuff, and camping gear. That’s basically what I’d want a truck for, plus the odd piece of furniture.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Low towing capacity and an outrageously miserable bed size. Less than five feet? The powertrain of this should have been put in a station wagon, not a “truck.”

      • sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        There used to be a market for small trucks which has all largely evaporated. I’m all in favour of a smaller utility truck with limited range. Something like this would be ideal for my business.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Curb weight 1634kg

    This was the standout spec that might make me consider one.

    I’ve been looking mainly at small hatchbacks/SUVs, and they all seem to weigh in at over 1800kg. And many are over 2000kg. Excluding Aptera…

      • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Weight affects basically everything. Less weight means less cost to buy, better range, better handling, less cost of maintenance (brakes, tires, etc), better safety, less getting stuck off-road, and so on…

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          +1

          Weight is everything. Removing it makes almost literally every aspect of a car better, and it’s usually a terrible negative for EVs.

          • Chip_Rat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Interesting! I must say I never considered it. My kia soul EV was heavy but handled very well. Loved that thing.

            • notthebees@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 days ago

              EVs have a very low COG due to the batteries being at the bottom of the car. This is a good thing for handling but making them lighter would be even better.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              Oh yeah, its more than that. Low weight helps acceleration, braking (so safety), handling, range, wear on every component, and most of all, cost. The same sized tires will need less pressure, wear much less, and grip harder. If the car is lighter, you don’t need as stiff a chassis, nor as much braking to lock the wheels, less battery, motor, which means you can take even more weight off the car… You get where I’m going.

              Racecars are fast because they are light, not because they have big engines and expensive bodies. Little 1500lb cars can lap a $3 million 1500hp (and quite heavy, because of all the stuff in it) Bugatti around a track.

              Heavy cars can handle OK, but the cost is big.