• toastmeister@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Duck.ai doesn’t data mine, and has o3 mini which I have found to be very good. Its got some extra functionality like lines to break up text.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah duck is all over bothered with since it came out since you don’t even need to login to use it.

    • Kuma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nice! I saw Mozilla also added an ai chat in the browser recently (not in the phone version that I have seen tho).

      It is too bad duck.ai only runs the small models. Gpt4o-mini is not very good, it can be very inaccurate and very inconsistent :( I would like to see the 4.1-mini instead, faster and better and got function calling, so it can do web searches for example. O3 can’t so it can only know what it knows until 2023.

      But thanks for the information I will be looking out for when 4.1 is added!

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And unmonitored? Don’t trust anything from Google anymore.

      What makes this better than Ollama?

      • Angelusz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Quote: “all running locally, without needing an internet connection once the model is loaded. Experiment with different models, chat, ask questions with images, explore prompts, and more!”

        So you can download it and set the device to airplane mode, never go online again - they won’t be able to monitor anything, even if there’s code for that included.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          never go online again - they won’t be able to monitor anything, even if there’s code for that included.

          Sounds counter-intuitive on a smart phone where you most likely want to be online again at some point in time.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            it does if you make it work in those conditions.

            software that “phones home” is easy to fool.

              • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                typically the phone home is looking for a response to unlock.

                use a packet sniffer to see what the request/response is and replicate it with a proxy or response server.

                this is also know as a man-in-the-middle (mitm).

                takes skill and knowledge to do, but once you do a few dozen it’s pretty easy since most software “phone homes” are looking for static non-encrypted responses.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    There is already GPT4All.

    Convenient graphical interface, any model you like (for Llama fans - of course it’s there), fully local, easy to opt in or out of data collection, and no fuss to install - it’s just a Linux/Windows/MacOS app.

    For Linux folks, it is also available as flatpak for your convenience.

  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wonder what this has over its competitors, I hesitate to think they released this for fun though