• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If only the energy to create it was from nuclear power. But the way it is now and in the foreseeable future … this is nonsense. You lose so much energy on the way, just use regular fuel instead. Use all of that energy in processes where it does not get wasted but saves much more CO2 instead.

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are ways to create biofuels that are much more environmentally friendly than hydrocarbon fuels, especially when starting from a waste product such as cooking oil or biomass from clearings that would otherwise be wasted.

      Plus, it’s good to test out these not-yet-incredible sustainable fuels so that we can learn, improve, and wean off traditional hydrocarbon fuels.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        While making it out of existing carbon compounds, of course, removes much of the energy needed, it is still a wasteful process. There are plenty of precesses where you can burn that fuel directly, with zero additional loses. We need to drive CO2 emissions down as fast as possible.

        This is something that can be tackled in 30 years, when/if airplanes still need to burn fuel and other, lower hanging fruits are already gone.

        What they are actually doing is trying to greewash airplanes.