Too narrow, hidden, minimal feedback…

    • zeddiq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would imagine the same designer who implements infinite scroll would also design bad scrollbars

      • Madrigal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        I recently had to talk a designer out of implementing a “webpage progress indicator” that was a thin horizontal bar across the top of the page that filled in as you progressed through the content.

          • Jesus_666@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They are bad replicas of school bars. Except you can’t use these to scroll the page and they use horizontal progress to express vertical progress. Everything they do could be done more effectively by having a visible scroll bar.

            • crabArms@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t see them as scroll bar replicas; good ones are very narrow but high contrast, to easily offer a compact visual sense of article length – rather than page length, an important distinction when there are cited sources, recommended articles, and a footer menu. Different functions.

              IMO, they should coexist with a well-designed vertical scroll bar.

            • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unless they were copying it from somewhere else, what were their arguments to implement it? Is it about gamefication of reading an article?

        • Turun@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I like it for articles. It shows progress through the text, not down the page, which are two different metrics which can differ wildly.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      links that are only modal floater windows drive me insane too. this isn’t anything! make a website!

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, it’s difficult to figure out how to present large amounts of information in a usable fashion. So let’s just NOT EVEN FUCKING BOTHER and just put everything into a gigantically long list instead.

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not that it’s difficult, this method encourages “doomscrolling” because the user doesn’t actively decide to go to the next page.

        The Nielsen Norman Group observes that “infinite scrolling minimizes interaction costs and increases user engagement.” Infinite scroll keeps users engaged and on the page because the page never ends: there is always something more to see, no wait to see it, and very few interactions.