• TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Rite Aid bought out our local pharmacy chain around Seattle (Bartell Drugs) a few years ago and it’s been a steady decline since. One of the two locations near me has closed down, and the one I go to has been more of a nightmare to deal with every time I go. I really need to get everything transferred over to CVS.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Switch over to a locally owned pharmacy if you can. The chains burn their pharmacists out.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      When they bought out Bartell’s, I commented that I assumed they would intentionally run it into the ground. That appears to have been accurate.

      Fuck Rite Aid.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        GoodRx is realizing handy since you can use it pretty much anywhere. If you meds are available at https://costplusdrugs.com then it could be significantly cheaper there. They are mail order only and don’t take insurance but they are often an ORDER OF MAGNITUDE cheaper!!! I have a prescription that’s covered by insurance and it’s still cheaper to get it from coat plus without insurance.

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having thought on it some more, I strongly suspect that they bought Bartell Drugs (local to Seattle and the surrounding areas) specifically because the real estate was valuable. Close the store, sell the real estate.

    • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And I’m still salty about Pharmacia getting bought out by Medley and then going under. Why can’t anyone just run a pharmacy without jumping through hoops chasing infinite growth? Pretty soon we’re all gonna be getting our meds from either Walmart or Amazon.

      • Carobu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        What flabbergasts me is the clear conflict of interest between infinite growth and actual patient care. We really need to take this profit model out of healthcare, the only people it hurts are us. Unions in all healthcare fields are about the only thing that can combat it now without actual legislation imo.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Forgive me on the (probably not totally accurate) details but I recall reading about how independent pharmacies get screwed over because insurance companies dictate what medications cost and therefore force these smaller independent pharmacies to sell their drugs at loss much of the time.

        After writing this I did google it and found an article from a couple years ago: https://whyy.org/segments/the-hidden-players-putting-independent-pharmacies-out-of-business/

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    So they basically made illegal money, and now that the legal punishment is looming, they jump ship, yes?

    • Centillionaire@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure they were legal prescriptions, but the government wants pharmacies to police doctors. Instead of just getting the doctor in trouble for writing for excess opioids, they want the pharmacies to be in trouble for filling the prescription the doctor wrote.

      The pharmacies make more money for selling more scripts, so the company isn’t incentivized to police the doctors and tell them “no” and there isn’t a set guideline on who to tell no and for what reason, but somehow the pharmacies are at fault.

      My take is that if the federal or state governments feel that doctors are writing too many opioid scripts, they should go after the doctors, not the pharmacies.

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pharmacist here. I can’t really agree with that take. We have shared liability, in large part because the doctor is super good at diagnosis, and relatively good at what to prescribe for it, and a pharmacist is not good at all at diagnosis, but is trained specifically on medications and interactions.

        A doctor should not be prescribing something harmful for you, but it happens, and the pharmacist catches it and calls and gets it straightened out. That’s a normal situation, but opioids are a bit different.

        The doctors were overprescibing, but we always were allowed to refuse prescriptions. If it was questionable, we can always call and document our conversation with the doctor. I’ve never heard of a pharmacist getting in trouble if they actually called and verified the MD did truly want that much medication, after being specifically warned of the risks.

        If the pharmacists did that call for all of these, then I’m with you it’s the doctors’ fault. But if they just took in the prescriptions and filled them without checking for safe use, they failed to do their job protecting the patient from harm.

      • Rusticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        An addict will get or steal prescriptions from multiple doctors. How does policing doctors prevent abuse as well as making the pharmacy the gatekeeper?

        • Waldowal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are lots of laws and regulations that don’t really work 100%, but make it harder for the crime to be committed. I think it fits into that category.

          For example, many financial companies bend over backwards to try and prevent business activities from occurring over unapproved communication channels. Basically the SEC forces them to monitor all business activities, and if the company doesn’t at least try to do things like block personal email web sites, log text messages to clients on personal phones, etc., the company can be fined for not trying hard enough. Even though all the things meant to block or monitor can be easily bypassed.

          I personally can’t decide if it’s the right thing to do in face of insolvable problems, or a stupid waste of time and resources. Probably a bit of both.

  • atocci@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    All the Rite Aids around here turned into Walgreens years ago and I guess I just assumed the entire company had been bought. I didn’t even realize they were still around until now…

    • quantumriff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Walgreens tried to buy rite aid in 2016-2018. As part of that deal, rite-aid sold a bunch of stores in towns that only had the two.