• adj16@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        /end thread.

        That’s the whole debate, OP. It’s solved with this short exchange.

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        But they eat animals.

        Fungi are more closely related to animals than plants. Are they vegan?

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          60
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you need to look up the definition of of “vegan.” It’s not based on what your food eats: you can’t call eating a grass-fed cow “vegan.”

          Fungi is also not animals.

          • anarchost@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you could operate a series of trolley problems regarding sentience for the average vegan, would a somewhat quantifiable hierarchy arise?

            For example, would a vegan save one human over three pigs, or over 100 pigs?

            If a vegan could use vegan means to prevent the death of all mosquitoes without upsetting the ecology of the planet Earth, but the mosquitoes would then start infecting more humans with hazardous but non-deadly diseases, should the vegan attempt those means?

            • xeddyx@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I can’t speak for other vegans, but as a vegan, I’d pick an animal’s life over a human’s, so your trolly problem is easy for me. Fuck humans, there are over 8 billion of us and we don’t need any more; fewer there are, the better it is for this planet.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Specifically it’s about the consent of any sentient beings involved in the production.

              Milk and eggs are fine as long as you’ve acquired them via free market exchange with the animal that produced them. n

              Like, breast milk from a woman is okay for a vegan to eat as long as it wasn’t forcibly taken from her.

              • jeffw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Which, to be clear, .00001% of human consumed milk doesn’t involve torturing cows and stealing their babies

            • jeffw@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is this a joke or are you a moron? We forcibly impregnate cows and steal their children… and then do it over and over again until they die

              I’m not vegan, but do you seriously not get how animal suffering works? Go watch Earthlings or Dominion if you’re curious

        • hallettj@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fungi are more closely related to animals than plants.

          I bring this up too. What my kid asks, “what is vegan?”, and my wife says, “someone who eats plants”, then I shout from across the room, “and fungi!” Tbh no one is amused but me.

          There’s nothing hypocritical about eating fungi! I just want recognition for the fungal contribution.