The long fight to make Apple’s iMessage compatible with all devices has raged with little to show for it. But Google (de facto leader of the charge) and other mobile operators are now leveraging the European Union’s Digital Market Act (DMA), according to the Financial Times. The law, which goes into effect in 2024, requires that “gatekeepers” not favor their own systems or limit third parties from interoperating within them. Gatekeepers are any company that meets specific financial and usage qualifications, including Google’s parent company Alphabet, Apple, Samsung and others.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google and company can go fuck themselves on this one, and I’m usually the first one to bash on Apple for selling overpriced status symbols.

    I’m frankly amazed at how much importance Google gives iMessage, when it’s not the number 1 messaging app anywhere in the world. Hell, even if you assume Apple halved its report of monthly active users in Europe, that’s 90 million people in Europe. Significant, but less than 25% of the total population of the EU

    Outside USA and Canada, you’ll be hard pressed to find people who give a damn about iMessage, because most are using a different, cross compatible app anyway, like Whatsapp or Telegram, even across most European countries.

    • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      because iMessage is probably the number 1 reason for iphone purchase in USA

      this will obviously help google gain market share in the us

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can highly doubt all you want but go do some research on current consumer behavior after you are done doubting.

    • RealHonest@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would you be against standardizing messaging over the net? How is that a bad thing?

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Because those aren’t internet messages, RCS is supposed to supersede SMS and MMS, which is how Google whatever (hangouts? talk? messages?) sends messages to iPhone numbers. Meanwhile, apple-apple communication via iMessage is done via internet
        • Because the standard is mostly controlled by Google and Samsung, Apple’s biggest rivals in the mobile space
        • Because Google has been completely anal about being easily spotted in iPhone conversations for quite a while. It is pretty obvious that this has nothing to do with using better standards. AFAIK, even phones that can use RCS have it turned off by default.
        • Because anyone with an internet connection already has access to several widely used apps that do much more than RCS does
      • MDZA@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because Google are trying to get regulators involved when it doesn’t really affect anyone?

        Seems like a bad idea on principle

        • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          In my opinion, ALL nessaging apps should be compatible with each other. It should be like email, just different clients on the same protocol. I know it won’t happen anytime soon (if ever in my life), but I’d like that. And we should start somewhere. Maybe here.

    • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      SMS would basically be dead if Apple adopted RCS, that’s why it’s important. SMS needs to die.

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honest question, should sms die because it’s being a paid for service or for the insecurity or both or more?

        • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’ll probably always stay as a fallback, but because it’s an incredibly outdated protocol and lived far past it’s age.

        • Firipu@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sms is a 20+y old standard. Could just be sending smoke messages, it would be equally secure and feature rich…