The flight system allows a plane to be remote operated by a pilot on the ground, which could streamline pilot airline operations in the future.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    11 months ago

    Better wages and work life balance would also solve the pilot shortage. It’s one of those jobs where companies over rely on people’s passion for the profession in lieu of treating and paying them what they deserve.

    • Mamertine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A decade ago, my pilot friend informed me that after 4 years of college, starting pay was $18,000 a year. After a year of experience suddenly you’re making 4 times that. Not a lot of people can afford to make that measley income for a year. It’s not a sustainable way to recruit talent.

      Then there’s the issue is being on call when you’re the lowest seniority in you’re position where they can call you anytime a pilot calls in sick and you have to be at the airport in 30 minutes.

      You can make a lot of money, but there’s a lot of bullshit to deal with at the start of your career.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lowering the costs of flight school would help more, making shitty money is one thing. Making shitty money when you dropped 200k to get there is another.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      And entry level second seat barely paying 40k a year to start.

      It’s like they want the world to collapse.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s what made my friend give up on becoming a professional pilot, paying 80k to then get a job where you are asked to travel to a destination and wait for the next flight possibly bringing you home…

    • Nommer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right? There’s no pilot shortage. Like with every other labor shortage it’s a wage issue.

      • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not just about wage. You could have great pay but terrible working conditions will discourage pilots from applying.

        Never heard my retired uncle say a single good thing about his work as a captain for a commercial airline. Cheap tickets comes at a price.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Our modern economy and world are built on the need for wage stagnation. Unfortunately that only lasts so long and we’re reaching the end of it. That is going to come with a massive correction that is going to be pretty painful for the masses because the last thing the rich want to do is not be making as much money. So how they handle it will determine whether they live through it or find out what it’s like to be looking at the inside of the basket at the end of a guillotine.

    • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m pretty sure they don’t get paid anywhere near what they’re worth. Same old story in the US: anything that’s important to society, has to do with people’s health, safety, education, and so on.

  • OpenStars@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is no possibility of this ever causing negative effects of any kind, certainly it will not ever be misused (like one pilot being pressured into flying 5 planes at once bc… profit).

    • Elon Musk, probably
  • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah autonomous flight has been a thing for 50ish years. But there will always be edge cases. Plus A lot of the safety we have in aviation that we have today is due to the two pilot system where every action is checked by your fellow pilot. I can’t see a near future where two pilots in the cockpit are not required for safety.

      • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Aside from planes being really expensive to replace, they usually contain some toxic chemicals like fuel, hydraulic fluid, and exotic metals. The lack of loss to human life might be nice, but it presents other complications.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m fine with self-flying cargo planes with no human passengers flying over uninhabited areas besides landing/takeoff.

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Predicated, of course, on radio frequency communication being 100% reliable, 24/7, 365.

    Which they are not.

  • RandomStickman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    I wonder how does ATC talk to the plane. Does it get routed to the remote pilot? The article describes controlling the plane through a series of menus. Does the pilot have enough flexibility when something unexpected happens like a sudden weather change or bird strike?

  • restingboredface@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve seen a tesla ‘self driving’ hit the breaks when approaching a bridge. No f-ing way am I flying on an AI-piloted plane.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you fly commercially then you’re flying in an airplane that flies mostly autonomously. The vast majority of the pilots interaction is during takeoff and landing. The rest of the time it’s pretty much flying itself.

      One huge difference between commercial aircraft & cars is that the air traffic is highly regulated. There are specific corridors & altitudes, distances between aircraft that must be maintained, and ground based controllers are monitoring and directing everything. It’s not even remotely like the free for all on the highways.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s still a pilot onboard if they need to takeover, what this article is describing is like having a ground based drone operator.

        “To address the pilot shortage”, ok so how long until each ground based pilot is flying multiple aircraft?

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Since a pilot is mainly only needed for take off and landing 99.9% of the time, I’d bet not much longer. Getting from an to the ground are the hard parts. Even then, during optimal conditions, you probably don’t even need the pilot, so it’s likely you’ll get pilots monitoring multiple aircraft from take off to landing and only interceding when an emergency arises. In time it’d probably become something they can do from their own homes. Then after they’ve collected enough data and trained the AI with it, they’ll be able to do away with the human pilot altogether.

          Any task humans do that don’t rely on smell or taste you can train an AI to do. The problem is no longer if you can make a machine smart enough to do it, the problem now is do they have enough data to train it. By making pilots remote they’ll be able to gather that data easily. Once we develop sensors that can perfectly mimic taste and smell, humans will only be needed for manual labor.

          • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            You have a grossly oversimplified understanding of human input during a flight. Once at altitude and cruising autopilot can be used, but a certain amount of hours actually flown as well as takeoff and landing are required, and AI isn’t near good enough to take-over during an emergency the way a human operator can react to the situation.

            Also manual labor won’t be a thing for long, Boston Dynamics is making progress hand over fist when it comes to quadruped and biped robotics. The moment we train models to handle labor jobs they’ll be out the door as well.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s worrying enough that faulty instruments and sensors can cause your pilot to just manually crash, let alone the autopilot.

    • test113@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This isn’t about AI and has nothing to do with whatever bullshits Musk is/was up to. They basically integrated drone tech into a Cessna and flew it remotely from a ground base. It’s drone tech combined with an autopilot—fairly basic and proven, already utilized in military, agriculture, and hobby industries. Also its for cargo not humans.