The difference between the two security features is that Safe Browsing will compare a visited site to a locally stored list of domains, compared to Enhanced Safe Browser, which will check if a site is malicious in real-time against Google’s cloud services.

While it may seem like Enhanced Safe Browsing is the better way to go, there is a slight trade-off in privacy, as Chrome and Gmail will share URLs with Google to check if they are malicious and temporarily associate this information with your signed-in Google account.

  • forked_bytes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    there is a slight trade-off in privacy, as Chrome and Gmail will share URLs with Google to check if they are malicious and temporarily associate this information with your signed-in Google account.

    Yeah just a slight trade-off of sending Google every URL you visit.

  • jackfrost@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny how Firefox can be at least as secure without it having to phone home every time you click on a link.

    Usually when this happens, we call it spyware, nuke it from orbit, and find an alternative.

  • alnilam@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    Nederlands
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “As Chrome and Gmail will share the urls with Google”.

    Chrome and Gmail are Google. You can replace this with “As Google and Google will share urls with Google” without any loss of accuracy.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the suggestion!

        I had a look, and must admit it sets my spidey sense in something of a tingle 🤔

        Their website says “© 2019 - 2021”, and the blog has a single post from 2019. Similarly, the knowledge base has one single post.

        Similarly, their GitHub doesn’t seem to have had any changes in the /src project, although this might be because they’ve moved development to /src.next.

        Actually, looking at /src.next, there does seem to be a lot of activity, with issues being closed regularly. Maybe it’s just the classic case of devs focusing on dev work and not outward communication or site maintenance.

        I’ll give it a go at some point and see how it feels 👍

  • 5453939160@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But Google is already analyzing all emails received. So the only difference is that they actually know which links have been clicked.

    The privacy issue is Gmail, not that particular feature.

  • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still get nagged constantly to add a birthday to my Google account to make sure I am older than 13 or something… To satisfy some dumb law I think. The email account is like 15 years old though. How could I be under 13 if it’s that old?

  • Duchess@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    god, i hate this shit. i have a lot of stuffed tied to my google accounts but i think i’m at least going to switch email apps.