• athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    There was some kind of delay in the release, to allow people who didn’t want their names to show up to request they get redacted. So expect anyone that’s still named to be able to spin the narrative.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There’s a handful of names from sexually abused women that remain redacted, and only 2 names that have additional time to justify why they should stay redacted. Source

      The judge said a handful of names should remain blacked out in the documents because they would identify people who were sexually abused.

      Two people whose name appears in the records have been given additional time to make arguments to the court as to why their names should stay redacted.