Non-EU citizens can only spend a total of 90 days over an 180-day period in the whole of the European Union.
Firstly, fuck the Express and fuck that site in particular, turned my phone’s screen into Times Square.
While the article doesn’t mention their 2016 voting, I’d love to see a Venn diagram of those who had the means and bought property in the EU, and those who had voted to leave. I suspect they’d not be far off a circle.
I feel genuinely sorry for the outliers (edit: assumed outliers) who believed in the EU’s ideals and wanted property for whatever reason - work, family, whatever - and are getting horsed by the Blue Passport Gang.
Anecdotally, a good friend of mine has British parents who moved to northern France, voted to leave, and are now shocked that new and harsher rules could possibly apply to them. The most frustrating part is that they’re absolutely blind to the prospect that they might just have pissed on their own chips. It’s genuinely saddening to see people put two and two together, and come up with “someone else’s fault”.
English exceptionalism is a disease that ails British society. People are shocked that the French etc. would apply reciprocal rules on Brits although in their minds it’s perfectly legitimate to apply harsh immigration policies to people wanting to come to the UK. They genuinely don’t understand it, and it’s tragic in a way.
they might just have pissed on their own chips
This might be the most British thing I’ve ever heard.
They voluntarily sprinkle vinegar on them so why not
Malt vinegar sours beefy quickly in open air, to the point that even after a single lunch rush at a chip shop, the bins reek of urine-like rotting vinegar… So, there’s that tidbit of trivia.
Lives in France, votes to leave the EU, fuck sake, these Brexit dummies make me ashamed to be English. Thanks for fucking over the rest of the country with your stupidity!
I genuinely can’t understand it, like I can’t even come up with a single plausible way these people could think this way. How could you live in France, in the EU, intend to continue to live there because you obviously like it, and think that your home country needs to do something different?
As somebody else pointed out above; “British exceptionalism”.
I was living in Britain at the time of the Leave vote and the vast majority of the Leave “arguments” were anchored in some way or other on the idea that Britons and Britain would get special treatment because of being who they are (remember the whole “German car manufacturers will make sure we have a good deal to keep access to the UK market” argument?).
Also I’m from a very touristic country and it’s pretty easy to notice the feeling of superiority of lots of Britons when they come here, especially old people.
(The funny bit its that I ended up in England after years in The Netherlands, so ended up with Northern European standards and hence was less than impressed by Britain by the time I got there in 2006)
Anyways, all this to say that it’s absolutelly believable that lots, maybe even most, of those older people who lived abroad after retiring (so never really integrated in the local society, as people actually working there would) did genuinelly believe the idea that Britons would get special treatment. I mean, here in Portugal they’re not especially well integrated but especially the stories from the Costas in Spain is of pretty much self-contained Little-England communities, english-speaking and with their own stores and everything, all filled with British retirees most of whom never go into the trouble of learning even the most basic Spanish.
PS: Just to add that some Remainer arguments were also of the British Exceptionalist kind. Specifically the whole idea of “We should stay in the EU and change it from the inside” also reeks of “we know best” and “the EU will change to accomodate us”.
That’s fair, thanks for your well thought out comment. I imagine most Europeans knowing your language can create a feeling of superiority.
The brexit arguments were pretty broad as well in terms of what the EU would do for us, so I suppose there may have been a pipe dream of maintaining the right to travel and remain. Ugh I don’t think I will ever not be angry about the outcome.
I always felt it was more of a “big country which was once an empire” problem.
Even my tiny Portugal has some level of “celebrating the greatness of the country” on account of what was done by people there 5 centuries ago (i.e. during the time of the Discoveries) and Britain’s “Glory Days” are closer in time, were even bigger and, maybe more importantly, unlike in my country were that kind of stuff is out of fashion because the Fascists were heavy users of it, there are frequent celebrations of past glories some way or another in British media and there is often a nationalistic slant in the reporting of international news (mainly of Britain being portrayed as more important and listenned to abroad than it actually is if you look at the coverage of the same news in other countries).
It’s understandable when you’ve spent your life seeing international news being reported always with a slant that makes Britain seem important (which it isn’t anymore than other similar-sized countries, and often looks kinda desperatelly trying to ride in the coat-tails of America, the real important ones) and were the Imperial past is constantly remembered (nowadays, mainly with films and TV series), one ends up believing “we’re special” and that was easilly weaponized by the Leave campaign and is still weaponized by the Tories.
Most Brexiter arguments wouldn’t at all be believable for those with a realistic and informed view about Britain’s position in the World, the view of Britain abroad and the balance of power between the rest of the EU and the UK.
some Remainer arguments were also of the British Exceptionalist kind. Specifically the whole idea of “We should stay in the EU and change it from the inside” also reeks of “we know best” and “the EU will change to accomodate us”.
To be fair, while it comes across as snotty arrogance, the idea of negotiating with the other member states to steer the Union in your favour is a power and responsibility of every member state.
The British relationship with the rest of the EU was, at least by the time I moved to Britain (so, 2006), adversarial (win-loose) rather than cooperative (win-win), the latter being more common in the rest of Europe, especially smaller nations.
Also keep in mind that this was following Cammeron’s demands for Britain to be allowed to limit Free Movement from the rest of the EU into Britain but not the other way around (i.e. Britons still kept that right, just stopped reciprocating it) “or else we’ll have a Referendum on leaving the EU”, which was what triggered the Leave Referendum, so “We should stay in the EU and change it from the inside” back then as justification to Remain rather than Leave sure sounded a lot like suggesting that the objective of priviledged treatment for Britons over the rest should be better pursued inside the EU.
It certainly didn’t came across as an appeal to it being better to carry on cooperating for the common good that to leave, which would be the kind of thing more likely to sway, say the Dutch or the Portuguese.
I suspect you might be confusing a local cultural artifact you see all around you in British Modern Culture with a general way of behaving in Europe: everybody is selfish to some point, but from the countries in Europe I lived in, Britain was the one were selfishness and adversarial approaches (you have to win, otherwise that mean you lose) were the most common and accepted. IMHO, Britain is in this in the middle between Continental Europe and the US.
Britain: “Screw the EU. We’re sick of following your regulations and welcoming your people into our country just to steal our jobs from hardworking British workers and scrounge off of our NHS and welfare state. But we still want to trade freely and come live in your countries whenever we feel like it, because we’re massive xenophobic hypocrites who think the entire world still revolves around us.”
France: “Fruckoff.”
“We don’t wanna be in the EU anymore!”
“Okay, then you’ll be treated like people who aren’t in the EU anymore.”
“No, wait…”
Articles like this are so disingenuous. UK news has been reporting things like this for several years now, always trying to make it sound like it’s us mean old continental Europeans who are forcing our evil rules on the poor blameless Britons. As opposed to being the exact thing they themselves voted for. Hello and fuck you from sunny Portugal, dear Brexit voters!
As a British person who spent several years living and working in EU countries before brexit and is now unable to - I don’t think I’ll ever stop being furious at the ignorant bigoted fucks who voted away the wonderful freedom of movement we shared with our neighbours. Useless slack-jawed gibbering wankers.
You have been permanently banned from c/Conservative.
So disappointed if that’s real and they followed us from Reddit
This is going to be very much an instance-dependent thing.
Nah, check the username.
LOL I actually had someone do that to me on Reddit. Saw some random post of mine they didn’t like and permanently banned me from a sub I never once heard of.
I am genuinely sorry you have been fucked over ☹️
I don’t think it was the British people with French homes that voted for brexit…
I personally know of two couples who did this. It’s totally Leopards ate my face shit
It absolutely was.
Spain did this first and most certainly idiots living in Spain voted against their own needs because they really didn’t think that there would be consequences.
Wait, there are consequences to Brexit and things have changed?!
I’m no ornithologist but I don’t think that’s a peacock.
Saying goodbye to their life in France, where they were paying around £2,574 (€3,000) in taxes every year,
So these people who were rich enough to own a second home wanted to spend more than 50% of their time in France, but were paying the vast majority of their taxes back to the UK?
No wonder the laws got tightened.
Did you read the article? The couple quoted spent about 140 days and now can’t spend more than 90.
Man, this thread is full of dickheads. Even if, say, only 30% of these people voted Remain, that’s a lot of people who deserve some sympathy. To damn a whole group of people when a substantial number share the exact same opinions as you is truly thoughtless.
I’m a remainer in a leave-majority area, for what it’s worth. May as well tell me about the “consequences of my actions” too!
You can feel sorry for roughly 45% of the state of TX while still staying clear of that shithole.
As a Texan, I understand…
No sympathy for deliberate stupidity and pride-based sense of entitlement.
Edit: I misread OP’s comment. Yeah, for those who voted Remain, geez, sucks to be you, and I understand (source: Did not want Trump to win.)
But the people I am talking about are the remainers who didn’t have that.
Oh. Sorry, I misread. You’re right.
But anyway.
I have a small suspicion that if Leave won, it’s because not enough Stay people go out and vote.
And those who did vote, yeah, that sucks. But that’s how “democracy” works (in quotes because I know there was a lot of external manipulation.)
Turnout was actually pretty good. But there was external manipulation, illegal spending, plus a ton of shifting goalposts, with no confirmation vote once the real Brexit “deal” existed. Pre-vote, people were told we’d be able to be like Norway, as unbelievable as that sounds now. Wild how a 52/48 result was taken as confirmation for the hardest Brexit possible. It truly sucks.
‘And I would’ve gotten away with it too, ecxept for those meddling consequences!’
Oh no, somehow they no longer hold the rights and privileges of being a part of the EU!!! What evil monsters did that to them?
If this is anything like what happened in Spain, then they had every opportunity to change their status and avoid any issues.
A substantial part of them applied for French citizenship after Brexit. If they received it, these are fine.
It’s funny to see the others crying over it.
Over here in the US, a bunch of Central American countries offer retirement visas, aiming at the American retiree market. Less-expensive, warm weather.
https://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/aging/articles/countries-that-offer-retirement-visas
8 Countries That Offer Retirement Visas
These countries welcome American retirees with special programs and benefits.
Countries around the world are looking to attract American retirees. Some countries have created visa policies specifically designed for retirees and in some cases offer special benefits and incentives for relocating. The most attractive retirement visas are usually found in Latin America, although a few Asian countries also offer appealing programs.
Back when Brexit was being figured out, I remember seeing a lot of discussion about retired Brits living in Spain being unhappy about not knowing what the future held. I commented a few times on how if Spain didn’t run a retirement visa program, they might consider doing so; it sounded like a lot of elderly Brits liked living in Spain.
they might consider doing so; it sounded like a lot of elderly Brits liked living in Spain.
Yeah but the question is, did the Spaniards like a lot of elderly Brits living in Spain? I can see them not bending over backwards for a clientele that may well have had a bad influence on local housing and cost of living ;)
I do think that this is what happened in a lot of contexts. Decades of people traveling abroad and making a bad name for their country finally caught up.
For Argentina, you just need to earn at least $500/month from a government-funded retirement (i.e. Social Security) of any sort and they’ll pretty much just give you a pensioner’s visa.
Alternative headline:
“Brits F**k Around, Find Out”
deleted by creator
Speaking as a Brit myself, yes a lot of us are this dumb.
I’ve seen more intelligence in low elo League of Legends lobbies than from (especially older) voters in this country.
Like, there are people who legitimately think the influx of Muslim and African immigration in our country is the EU’s fault.
British are extremely delusional. The island has been skating by on imperial history for decades and everything is finally flipping on them lol
Skating
Fixed it 👍
This is also my take. A huge proportion of the population seems to be resting on the laurels earned by their parents and grandparents, assuming that things would never change.
If by laurels you mean pillaging the developing world then yeah.
I’m speaking specifically to have installed all the freeways and the dams and other stuff then letting them rot. I’m speaking to creating a great middle class then letting it rot.
The developed world is full of narcissist who really do think that they are better than a sizable portion of the world’s population just because they happened to be born in their country. It’s like that idiot you had to go to school with who thought he was the best thing ever just because his father was a successful car salesman. None of these people did anything to earn or deserve what they have, but feel that they are entitled to it.
How about just not using the slur?
I’m afraid that the term “retarded” is a technical diagnosis available within the DSM. Though society may have abused the word, it is a legitimate term.
Using a term describing people with a handicap as an insult is a shitty thing to do
I can tell you from experience that this is not an argument you can win. People will apparently rally behind their right to be mean. I’ve taken it on and been savaged for my efforts.
Slur not justified. So many better ways to convey what you mean.
What’s next? “Pardon my slur, but what a bunch of n***ers”?
