• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      It might be a little surprising given what I literally just said, but I am not unreservedly in favor of just grabbing someone else’s content from someone else’s server and then playing it without the ads that pay for the hosting bills for the origin server.

      I realize I’m probably in the minority in that, but I feel like a fully off-Youtube video hosting solution might be a better way.

      • randomname01@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        I get what you’re saying, but the simple fact is that most of the content is on YouTube. An alternative would be better (and PeerTube might get there one day), but you’d be very limited in your choices if you avoided YT entirely. Also, I can’t personally feel too bad about “stealing” from YouTube.

      • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        In this case, the someone else is Alphabet megacorp. I wouldn’t waste any concern on them. The content is still hosted by YouTube, just played through the invidious instance.

        To do away with all those concerns, you could self-host invidious, or donate to the instance you choose to use if self-hosting is outside of your technical prowess. If you want to support certain creators, donate to them directly instead.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It really gets to be a lot of edge cases to keep track of nowadays though, am I the only one? I mean the collection of scripts I have to keep track of to keep everything running as normal feels like the beginning of a new operating system.

          • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            In hosting invidious or what? I’ve got it running pretty maintenance free in a docker LXC in Proxmox and use Twingate for access to it and everything else outside my home network. There was a learning curve to set up, but there’s plenty of yt tutorials to guide you through.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ve got it running pretty maintenance free in a docker LXC in Proxmox and use Twingate for access to it and everything else outside my home network.

              Read that sentence back to yourself and tell me there isn’t a lot to keep track of. Remember, this is specifically for solving 1 issue. Sysadmins and hard core masochists will learn every framework and take a scalpel to both software and hardware if needed, but that is not 99% of the world’s demographic.

              • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Yes, it’s a lot of words, but there’s really nothing to keep track of after setup. I just go to my invidious ip rather than youtube.com and it works. There are very good tutorials available if you want to implement these solutions. That’d be a good first step rather than the ‘I’ve tried nothing and am all out of ideas’ approach.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just bought a Nebula subscription. I can’t say they’re a replacement for YT, but they have good content.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, I was gonna say something about Nebula / Curiositystream. I actually think that that + somewhere to play music would take care of 95% of what I use Youtube for.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think that’s a very valid point, because that’s literally what Google does with AMP links…

      • kworpy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Google is the 4th richest company in the world… Besides they don’t deserve a dime from you, fuck them.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s not about them; it’s about me. They’ll be fine whatever any of us does, yes.

      • Luke@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are other instances for both piped and invidious aside from the ones linked above. I believe the intended usage involves you finding the instance closest to you in terms of network, which may not be those specific instances linked above.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yew a kind of coniferous tree which has red, berry-ike fruits, most parts of which are highly poisonous.