Hello everyone,

Opening this thread as a kind of follow-up on my thread yesterday about the drop in monthly active users on !fediverse@lemmy.ml.

As I pointed in the thread, I personally think that having some consolidated core communities would be a better solution for content discovery, information being posted only once, and overall community activity.

One of the examples of the issue of having two (or more) exactly similar Fediverse communities (!fediverse@lemmy.world and !fediverse@lemmy.ml ) is that is leads to

  • people having to subscribe to both to see the content
  • posters having to crosspost to both
  • comment being spread across the crossposts instead of having all of the discussion and reactions happening in the same place.

I am very well aware of the decentralized aspect of Lemmy being one of its core features, but it seems that it can be detrimental when the co-existing communities are exactly the same.

We are talking about different news seen from the US or Europe, or a piece of news discussed in places with different political orientations.

The two Fediverse communities look identical, there is no specific editorial line. The difference in the audience is due to the federation decisions of the instances, but that’s pretty much it, and as the topic of the community is the Fediverse itself, the community should probably be the one accessible from most of the Fediverse users.

What do you think?

Also, as a reminder, please be respectful in the comments, it’s either one of the rules of the community or the instance. Disagreeing is fine, but no need to be disrespectful.

  • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Deciding on a single community to rule them all is a bit hard because of defederation - shall we choose .world and we basically remove beehaw users from discussion, and .ml also has their defederation list. Communities like c/fediverse and c/lemmy must be available to everyone IMO.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe there should be a dedicated Fediverse discussion instance, federated with everyone, as a kind of United Nations of the Fediverse?

      Moderation could be tricky, but I guess a few people could give a hand.

      • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How can we force this instance to federate with everyone though? If we centralize the discussion in a single place, we would put a lot of trust into maintainers of said instance. We can build “backup” instances for that purpose, but that would destroy the initial goal - to have a single discussion place.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s interesting, because it can be compared to real politics where you have nations that are neutral and can serve as hosts for events where countries with completely different views and sometimes even high tensions can meet.

          The League of Nations (that preceded the United Nations) used to be hosted in Switzerland, which is usually seen as a neutral ground.

          Maybe we could try to have something similar? Or we can even imagine a large list of admins, all from different instances, so that everyone watches what is happening with the instance, so that no one could hijack it?

          • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            In the end, it would still be on someone’s server. And people would need to trust the owner of that server to pay, maintain and not interfere unnecessarily.

              • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes, but you wanted a neutral ground, and my point was that it’s hard to have something like, because in the end it would just be another server. I am not saying we don’t need a solution, I just pointing out a flaw in your proposed solution.

                • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s fair, and this is why I said having an admin team composed of people from different instances would be a way to mitigate that.

                  Regarding costs, as it would be a content instance with only a few communities (you want everyone to be able to access the communities on that server, but without any users, this server would not have to replicate any of the other communities) the cost should be kept quite low.

                  Donations could come from other instances as a way to show their good faith about an open fediverse space.

                  I’m questioning now how the United Nations is funded, but it’s probably based on member countries donations.

          • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m also curious about users. If this instance basically federates with every instance, even the most bigoted one, wouldn’t it become a host for users with maligned interests? And communities on that instance would be a very dangerous and noisy space too for the same reason.

            • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The instance would only hosts a few communities (!fediverse, and maybe a few others).

              Users would not be allowed to register there. Moderation would indeed need to be heavy, you can imagine only moderators being able to create posts, while users would be allowed to comment (you would have to ask a moderator to open a topic. Cumbersome, but at least you prevent topic spamming).

              • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                you can imagine only moderators being able to create posts, while users would be allowed to comment

                I don’t really think this is viable. Most posts on c/fediverse, c/lemmy, c/plugins, etc. are made by users, and these are quite active communities, I doubt mods will be able to deal with the load.

                  • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    True, but it also means Beehaw users can’t really reach new plugins/themes announcements. And I’m not sure how many other instances defederated from sh.itjust.works tbh.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, please. Most of the defederations are for a good reason. In !fediverse@whatever I want to read about fediverse, not racist bullshit and spam.

        • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s not actually how defederation works. You would still not be able to see those your instance has defederated from.

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, that’s exactly what I want? Defederating from the spammy and racist instnaces means I will not interact with them at all, which is what I want - I don’t want to read their racist bullshit and spam. I don’t see where I misunderstood how defederation works.

              • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If there were no defederations, yeah, I would. I’ve seen racist and homophobic bullshit in a community for my instance news before I defederated.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s an interesting question.

          I just had a look at lemmy.ml block list, and EH are blocked.

          I guess at some point you just have to block the bigots.

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        An instance dedicated to the Fediverse would be the ideal solution.

        Lemmy in general could use a lot more instances centered around specific topics.