• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I completely agree with you, and that’s precisely why I’m effectively pro-choice. Women should have absolute privacy here.

    My wife has had a miscarriage before, and my coworker had to walk back a pregnancy after a miscarriage. I’m absolutely sympathetic to that, hence why I’m so adamant that privacy is always respected. I also think women have absolute control over what they do with their body, so even if they are trying to induce a miscarriage, I think the should be completely free to do that and never the subject of a criminal charge.

    I’m not sure how what I wrote could be misconstrued to the contrary.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m okay with abortion being technically illegal, but the above would likely make it legal for all intents and purposes, and I’m okay with that.

      Do you have any ideas how few doctors are going to be willing provide care if this is the state of abortion law?

      I’m okay with abortion being technically illegal

      As someone who has never been involved with an abortion and would not want that choice made, I am not.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Why wouldn’t doctors want to? The first trimester is essentially a blank check (the vast majority of abortions), and everything after that has a pretty high bar (intent plus sealed medical history). The likelihood of anyone getting charged is incredibly low, especially if they can point to any form of medical expediency.

        It would be similar to the self-defense laws in many red states, they’re so loose that charges almost never stick if there’s any possibility that it was self defense.