• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “eyes on going public”

    Well, there’s the death knell. Not that it was awesome to begin with, just a stepping stone to get people away from WhatsApp.

    Come on Signal, SimpleX, XMPP!

    I struggle to understand why XMPP isn’t the de facto messaging standard around the world, I was using it on my first Android phone in 2009, 15 years ago - and was able to seamlessly message people on computers even then. Granted it was hell on battery back then.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      One reason Telegram is doing so well is that its clients are just so DAMN good and feature rich.

          • Clot@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            the thing is, Ive been using its crypto features for freelancing and everything went smoothly till date (been using it for 1 year). If you term crypto in general is scam, thats different thing

    • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Personally with XMPP, I think it’s right now because of the lack of decent looking clients (especially on iOS), as well as a lot of the same friction that people have suffered with mastodon.

      Also, Signal is built towards a completely different audience that places privacy first over modern messaging features (things like API’s, sending messages through voice assistants, etc.). And for SimpleX, I’m not really sure if sharing a QR code/link with someone else is the best route to go in UX just to message a friend

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Xmpp was designed for ease of federation and simplicity in implementation. Most messaging apps these days are designed, or at least say they are designed, with privacy first. There probably are plugins for xmpp to allow for e2e encryption and contact list and metadata privacy from server admins but that depends on the server and will probably not be as secure as signal. Just as signal can be federated but it’s complex and not really worth it.

      There’s a tradeoff between privacy/security and federation/decentralization and most people value privacy and security more.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I struggle to understand why XMPP isn’t the de facto messaging standard around the world,

      I suspect that normies subconsciously want all popular messaging services to be insecure.

      Humans are often self-confident in a bad way about imagined chaos.

      So if a service in insecure, then some day (as that dreaming normie thinks) they might “come to darkweb” and find “a hacker” to help them against something bad. After all, that’s how movies show life.

      And if a service is secure, then, that normie thinks, it’s either a scam or at least something that movies have not prepared them for. Same with encrypting mail.

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, there’s the death knell.

      Like Microsoft, EA, facebook, twitter, reddit right? With the amount of corporate death nerds within their bubble have been predicting, there would be no evil corporations. and yet, here we are.

      Stop overestimating when your intuition tells you what’s a death knell.

      Not that it was awesome to begin with, just a stepping stone to get people away from WhatsApp.

      People can use Signal, XMPP, Telegram and also whatsapp depending on their privacy requirements. Modern smartphones are capable like that.

      I used to use scp to transfer files off of remote servers 20 years ago. You don’t see me recommending it every time dropbox gets mentioned. Cool down with self-agrandizing bs.

        • just_another_person@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          A company eyeing going public will not be putting user privacy at the forefront of their features to file. Also, the very nature of Telegram’s design and infrastructure is less secure than other alternatives, so why even bother with it if you care about privacy? If it’s because “it’s easy”, then acknowledge the downsides, and move on, but they’ll never be able to operate with PFS as it exists now.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Exactly.

            Public makes things worse, not better, because now they’re beholden to stock valuations.

            So this means I have a year to finish my self-hosting project which includes my own messaging system (well, not making my own, but hosting one of the available projects, like SimpleX or an XMPP server).