• Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    9 months ago

    These guys are the kind we need more of. Dwarf Fortress is very much a labor of love and well worth the price on Steam. They have over 20 years of development put into it and even though the steam version got a fresh coat of paint, the text mode version is still free.

    Anyone curious about Dwarf Fortress should check out Kruggsmash on Youtube. He has been making Dwarf Fortress videos for years and really does a good job of revealing the stories that evolve during gameplay.

    • fuckyou@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      When they accidentally killed cats by alcohol overdose by having them lick their paws and not considering they might step in ale.

      I mean, if you don’t see the beauty in that I don’t know what to tell you…

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or when dwarves would go blind because they had liquid in their eyes and no way to get it out. Dwarves have eyelids because of that.

    • Questy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Kruggsmash is so creative and cool. I don’t play DF, I bought a copy though because I love watching the stories it creates. I hope I’ll get into sometime, but just a little support in the meantime.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I dunno about morally filthy, but the dwarves are definitely literally filthy

        • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Making soap in Dwarf Fortress is difficult, but by no means impossible. No need for your citizens to have unhappy thoughts - or worse get infected wounds - because they can’t clean!

  • schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Aren’t video game workers “gig” contracts? You don’t hear about actors getting mad when the job is done and there’s nothing more to act on, they gotta go and find their next gig.

    Not every game dev needs artists at all times, programmers at all timea, coders at all times etc. of your not making a new game, yeah you gotta lay of graphic designers, what are they gonna do?

    • IonAddis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Actors have unions. Actors also get royalties or a percent of sales.

      Afaik video game workers have neither unions nor do they get a % of the profits.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not all actors are in a union, and no they don’t get royalties or a percent of sales, that depends on the contract.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Not all actors are in a union

          Are you speaking on the planet, or just in America?

          Last I heard, for America, they have to be in the union, once they have been discovered, and want to work for major studios. Otherwise, they can’t do the work.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      They’re not. It’s not uncommon after a game is developed for there to be a degree of churn in the development studio, but 1) that’s not ideal, 2) that’s not what’s been happening recently.

      They typically don’t refer to the typical post game churn as “layoffs”, and they also typically happen after a game launches, not inline with the entire industry laying off a bunch of people.

    • x2Zero7@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s just…that’s just not how this stuff works m8. By and large no, “video game workers” are not gig/contract most of the time. It does happen, especially at lower levels; but it’s foolish to believe anywhere close to the majority of layoffs come from contracts. Those often have built in buy-outs anyways - this is talking about the full time artists/staff/programers who are always working on something

      You don’t honestly think Infinity Ward laid people off after not getting the contract for Call of Duty: Black Ops (2010) following Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2009) do you? Or consider the time between Naughty Dog’s Crash Team Racing (1999) and Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy (2001) - That’s two years. Two years without releasing a game, yet they didn’t lay anyone off?

      Buddy, there is always a next project. Project Managers will fill every single artist’s calendar of deliverables for supporting the current game (someone has to make DLC, though it is sometimes outsourced) and any future projects. They also do buy assets and employ contract work in these domains, but again, it’s small in the grand scheme of things.

      Programmers will always be optimizing the engine, working on patches for an updated build, or again working on the next game because every business worth it’s salt isn’t going to fire experienced staff in preparation for the next project as demanded by the need for more returns

      Unless other economic factors change - a company may choose to engage short term solutions to keep profits looking healthy. If it’s cheaper to lay people off then it is to compete on merit (make a new game) why would you from a business perspective?

      These companies are run by bean counters; not artists and devs anymore. Almost every game company was started by people who wanted to make good games, and now these same companies are laying people off regardless of their position in the market.

      Idk. Games come out way too frequently to support the idea that these people are getting laid off in between projects. It doesn’t add up. These layoffs are very recent in the grand scheme of the game industry.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        this is talking about the full time artists/staff/programers who are always working on something

        This is talking about every worker isn’t it?

        Buddy, there is always a next project.

        No there isn’t.

        Programmers will always be optimizing the engine, working on patches for an updated build

        And when they aren’t needed since the next project is in story board and design mode… and the previous project has been shelved….? There’s not always work available 100% of the time, that’s just silly. Also, some outsource engines and don’t need programmers, so not at all actually.

        • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not a good idea to put all your eggs into one basket when running a business, mate. You always run multiple projects, and it doesn’t have to be games, to continue the cashflow.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Pre-production happens while the previous project is in active development so they can’t shift everyone over to the new project as soon as they can. They aren’t sitting on their hands to start that process until the previous one finishes.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            What about studios that just make 1 or 2 games over 10 years? You’re ignoring the studios that put out the largest amount of games and talk about them like they are everyone else. Theres thousands of these studios compared to the dozens you are talking about like they are gospel.

            I’m sorry the industry is far larger with more intricacies than you thought. Even these small studios go through the same layoffs during downturns, it’s just not a big deal since it’s only a handful of employees. Even though that may be 20% of their work force, so that’s actually worse………

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Pre-production still keeps a project ready to go when the previous one finishes. Trust me, I have a lot more knowledge on the industry than you do. I have several friends in the industry and have considered entering it myself. Studios don’t just lay employees off between projects. That’d be horribly wasteful. Any half decent producer will always have tasks for people to work on.

              • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Trust me, I have a lot more knowledge on the industry than you do. I have several friends in the industry and have considered entering it myself.

                Oddly, I can also claim the same thing, that’s why I know that people get laid off between jobs, since it actually happens. Or course I could be making this up, just like you are.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I am not making it up. What you’re talking about used to happen a lot more, but even then it wasn’t that common. The small studios will often work on contract work if they didn’t have a projects of their own, and large studios have multiple projects going at the same time. One of my friends just recently they canceled their project but luckily didn’t lay them off and just switched them to a different ongoing project. Indie studios generally they wear many hats and everyone does pre-production, design, and other tasks.

                  It’s too time consuming and expensive to train up all new staff every project. Maybe a handful get laid off, but it isn’t gig work. It’s unusual for that to happen.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The studios who are laying people off are the studios with hundreds or thousands of employees with multiple projects active at any given time. No, it’s not gig work. Even small studios working on one project generally don’t do this. When one project is done, the next one is through pre-production and ready for development to begin usually, or they’ll have a break. Usually keeping employees happy and loyal will be more effective than training new employees every time a project starts. It’s stupidly inefficient to do that.

      Plus, that shouldn’t be acceptable almost anywhere. People should be able to have stable lives with reliable incomes and locations. Expecting anything else is horrible for the workers lives.

    • SurvivalMariner@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The difference is, actors do it out of choice, and through power. If the gig workers are doing it through no choice and because employers don’t want to give them the same benefits as permanent employees, it’s exploitative.