• theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    There have been proposals that address this. The way it was handled is that the buyer puts their own info in the system on their end and it returns a token/code that is given to the seller. The seller enters the token and name then system gives a red light or green light. It doesn’t include the serial number of the gun or the identity of the seller, there is no retained record to be entered in a database. Just a go/no go response for the seller.

    The proposal was rejected by democrats for not going far enough so instead we have nothing.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ha. Yeah, rejected by Dems sounds about right. In my general experience, establishment Dems aren’t going to be seriously on-board with anything that doesn’t involve bans on models, features, or entire types of firearms. Kinda like Republicans aren’t willing to accept any compromise on “border security” that doesn’t completely ban non-white/non-christian people.

      TBH, I’m deeply frustrated that Dems appear unwilling to seriously work for the kinds of changes in material circumstances that would affect rates of violent crime without enacting bans and registries. Even “liberal” cities like San Francisco are backsliding sharply.

      • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I moved from the Seattle area to rural Oklahoma a year and a half ago. 5 years in WA made me not actually be mad about OK.