• lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you adhere to that philosophy, then why not adhere to the fact that there are other coffee shops customers can take their business and let the better shop who can achieve cheaper rates for alternative milks win as opposed to imposing a price control?

      This isn’t Healthcare where shopping around isn’t an option, and it isn’t a niche thing where there isn’t competition.

      Shit I’m all for strong market regulations, but this might be a tad too far and ignorant to business ownership – especially one where we seek new entrepreneurs and not mega companies who can afford teams of lawyers.

            • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              So here is how this goes just so you know.

              Now all of the drinks go up in price so that the charge is just absorbed by the other customers.

              The business makes no less money, hell they probably make more profit now and now everyone has to pay extra.

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                It’s almost a mockery of the ADA.

                What’s more likely: the plaintiffs have a legitimate grievance, or they’re hoping to get rich suing a large business? (not that I have much sympathy for large businesses like Starbucks but you get my point).

                Consider that the context of the ADA is one that notes the disabled cannot explicitly be charged extra for the accommodations made in the first place for fulfilling the ADA requirements (e.g., wheel-chair ramp access), it becomes a bit more ambiguous in whether a product or service that is provided to everyone and independent of these explicit requirements falls under this category. In other words, the disabled here aren’t being singled-out or discriminated upon any more than any other person is who asks for it. THAT would be VERY illegal.

                … Hence why this isn’t automatically resolved and will be reviewed and argued in court, and thus we shall see. And I’m not a lawyer so who knows.

            • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah of course, that’s so unfair to tell business people that they can’t overcharge people

              Can you demonstrate that they are overcharging? Have you calculated the costs? Did you include the extra refrigeration space required, the wholesale cost of bulk milk in non-consumer packaging versus milk alternatives likely purchased by the case in consumer packaging? Do their distributors charge more for milk alternatives because they represent a lower volume than traditional milk.