I can’t believe I have to defend reddit for once.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thank you for asking that question. That was the primary reason I was going to read the article. Since it doesn’t explain that, I won’t bother.

    • stankmut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not mentioned in the filing, so we can only speculate.

      …on March 18, 2024, Nokia Technologies sent us a letter indicating they believed that Reddit infringes certain of their patents. We will evaluate their claims.

      That’s all we’ve got to go on.

    • homesnatch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nokia has a patent on making things out of bricks, and the CEO of Reddit has a brick for a head. Case closed if you ask me.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      Can’t seem to find that anywhere, but there’s a totally organic and not at all sus post on Reddit calling Nokia patent trolls.

  • RampageDon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This “article,” if you can call it that, might as well have just been a tweet. There is 0 other relevant information like what the patents actually are.

    • stankmut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      6 months ago

      It basically is a tweet. It’s a quick post, which is designed for The Verge writers to write a quick thought or link to a story using a website they control instead of posting it on Elon’s website.

      • RampageDon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right but then why would I bother going to the verge anymore, when they link to a pay walled website? Why not go directly to that website? I am by no means advocating Twitter, but a tweet makes sense because it might reach an audience it normally wouldn’t.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    These comments are kind of silly. There are 0 details about the patient claim, but a bunch of people are picking sides based on how they feel about a brand name. Classic Lemmy.

  • FlumPHP@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hate patent trolls, but I will say “it couldn’t have happened to a nicer company”. I hope they both go broke on legal fees.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Genuine question: does Nokia have a bad history with patent trolling?

      To me Nokia is just that old cell phone company that never quite made it even though they were iconic.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They’ve been bought and sold to the point that all that’s left is their patent portfolio. Their current business strategy appears to be “patent troll”. They’ve been holding industry telecommunications methods hostage instead of negotiating fair use fees.

        Google “nokia lawsuit fair use”.

  • ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    How does their current logo “remind” is about their focus on patent licensing and telecom…?

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seems like they switched to this logo:

      It does kind of feel like the logo of a consultancy/legal/finance group to me. But I could also imagine this looking decent when embossed onto a phone…

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can’t believe I have to defend reddit for once.

    I’m not rushing to pick a side until someone posts the actual patient claim. Both of these parties suck, and I’m not giving anyone the benefit of the doubt.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Thing is, if a patent applies to Reddit, there’s a chance it applies to Lemmy or other boards as well. Unless it’s very specific to Reddit alone, this is probably not a good thing.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    How can they flex a networking parent on a SaaS? Doesn’t that fall under some clause that’s standard for doing business?

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one posted what the suit is about. I don’t know how we can make that claim right now.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Given it’s reddit I can’t see how it could be about anything other than software patents.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    Both sides suck here but I have to side with Reddit over patent trolls. Nokia, what a disgrace you are these days if you have to resort to patent trolling. You used to be cool. That said, if this hurts Reddit’s IPO then I’ll be happy anyways.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Enforcing a patent is not necessarily patent trolling. Is Nokia’s sole purpose to collect patent for things they have no intention or capability to create and sell? That’s the definition of a patent troll. Nokia doesn’t exist solely to collect patents and make their revenue by suing actual business.

      We got people out here mad at shit they don’t even understand…

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        If you’re enforcing a patent that would have been come up with other people in the same field, then the patent is invalid, many of us would consider going after people with an invalid patent – patent trolling.

        Patents are meant for UNIQUE ideas and things that nobody else would have come up with on their own. But increasingly they’re being used for obvious ideas that thousands of other people also have around the same time, to lock out competition.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s a difference between patent trolling and protecting their patents.

      Provided Nokia just won a case, it’s extremely doubtful they would fall into the “troll” catagory.

      Why do you think they’ve become a disgrace?