A New York judge has imposed a gag order on Donald Trump, limiting the former president from making statements about potential witnesses in the criminal trial relating to hush money payments scheduled to begin next month.
Judge Juan Merchan also said that Trump can’t make statements about attorneys, court staff or the family members of prosecutors or lawyers intended to interfere with the case. Trump is also barred from making statements about any potential or actual juror.
The former president, Merchan wrote, has a history of making “threatening, inflammatory, denigrating” statements against people at all levels of the justice system, including jurors.
You must log in or register to comment.
he will break the gag. he will just rack up more fines to continually appeal to avoid paying
With Trump and the judges’ general lack of courage to enforce the law against oligarchs, these tend to be more like gag suggestions.
A pre-emptive gag order is a good sign that maybe this judge has some backbone. A 6 month contempt of court sentence might slow Donny down.
Meh, he had a gag order before, ignored it and not much came off it. I’ll believe it when I see it.
a custodial sentence.
I don’t like Trump, but gag orders shouldn’t be a thing either.
I have to disagree, especially in this case.
Forget the fact that his public statements can cause real damage to the targets of his accusations.
The gag order is called for if only to ensure he receives a fair trial with an outcome determined by an untainted jury. Whether he is trying to or not, every public statement potentially removes jurors from the pool by having them create a predetermined opinion on the defendant and the case.
This is literally a case where the judge needs to “protect the defendant from himself” as well as protect the proceedings from a mistrial or future appeals.
Help me understand your perspective.
My perspective is, when Trump tweets/truthsocials anyone’s name in a court case about him, said person and person’s family receive death threats, bomb threats and other forms of intimidation.
So for this I see gag orders as important when used for good.
Providing two sources for sauce. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/judge-engoron-staff-death-threats-antisemitic-attacks-1234894395/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/11/bomb-threat-judge-ny-fraud-trial/
Sure just let Trump commit stoic terrorism in hopes everyone is scared to cross him rather than gag him because he ALWAYS does it. That seems like a great way to make sure justice is done.
This is a semantic objection which completely ignores context and scope.
The ‘gag order’ bars Trump from using his platform to intimidate witnesses and employees of the court.
