• GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    To anyone who has played it - does it look a lot better than say, Witcher 3 or Elden Ring? Because in the footage and photos I’m not seeing much that explains why it’s so hardware-intensive. If you told me this came out 5 years ago I’d probably believe you based off the graphics in the review I watched.

    • Myr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s all about art direction and style. From what I’ve played in DD2, it’s very much the first game but more complex NPCs, which is my own bottleneck. My poor i7-4790k can’t handle staying in Vernworth for more than 5 mins lmao. I do like how much attention the art direction got in the castle, was legit jaw dropping first glance. The graphics definitely isn’t that much of an issue.

      I personally still vastly prefer Elden Ring’s wonderfully twisted style, same with anything From puts out. And I can play them on my potato.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        By today’s standards, that’s a pretty weak CPU at this point. I upgraded from mine not long after the Gamers Nexus review that pegged it at about the same performance as a 10th gen i3. I was already planning to upgrade at that point, but it really was a kicker.

        • Myr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          oh boy YEP it was a wake-up call lol. Built this thing in 2015 to play Fallout 4, and sadly it was the best that my motherboard could handle. So I just ended up getting myself an i9-14900k, hoping to get 9 more years out of the rest of the parts.

    • TheChurn@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      It looks much better than elden ring in that all the models are much higher quality. Elden Ring was designed around relatively modest assets, and does wonders with what it has, but there is no comparison, DD2 wins hands-down.

      As for art direction, that is subjective. Plenty of reasons to prefer looking at ER.

      The Witcher 3 is almost a decade old at this point

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imo, doesn’t look good enough to warrant the performance. And the devs already said the problem is Cpu not graphics

    • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      My GPU is a GeForce RTX 2700S and my CPU is exactly the minimum spec, an AMD Ryzen 5 3600, and I’m able to play at a stable 30FPS with only occasional stutters when loading a new chunk in a big city. In my 50+ hours played, I haven’t once had performance negatively impact my experience.

      Edit: With the latest game update, I now get 60FPS while exploring and 40-50FPS in cities.