• DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biggest reson for this is probably area density…the areas with fewest cars per capita are the places where things are geographically condensed,which makes public transport a viable alternative. Most southern cities are simply too spread out for public trans to be economically viable, and so having more vehicles is more pertinent.

    • bluGill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      While density is helpful ,US suburbs can support great transit for less than the cost of their cars. However they can’t support bad transit, or even okay transit.