• endhits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    6 months ago

    They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

      • Dark ArcA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

        • jaschen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Case in point. Vine literally can’t survive and so shouldn’t TikTok. Unless of course it’s getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

          • retrieval4558@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Why are you so convinced that an advertising platform that a 1/3rd of the country is glued to is unsustainable. And that’s ignoring the rest of the world, which is the majority of their user base.

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The same reason why twitter was NEVER profitable and it had more eyes glued to it. World presidents were using twitter for announcements. Never profitable.

          • jorp@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            What’s the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven’t we banned this yet

            • jaschen@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I wouldn’t consider Uber. This is closer to Vine vs TikTok. And we all know what happened to Vine.

      • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

        But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

        • Dark ArcA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, it’s literally a different app in China.

          • AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            It’s the same thing, the international one was called TikTok and the US version is handled by Oracle

            It’s called douyin or something idk in China but it’s the same shit

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.