• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you want to move the Overton window, you vote. That’s the perspective you need.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah. You need to vote for candidates that don’t just look out for rich people.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        How do you get that? By moving the Overton window. And how do you get that? By VOTING. But it seems you want to yell at a cloud instead. Something tells me you’ll just keep at this ‘whoo is me’, so I’m out.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Wrong. The party that can “move left” went to court to assert their right to do what they want regardless of voters, and have an equal hand in moving the goalposts anytime a third party comes close to the requirements for inclusion. Hell, just look at their messaging - they don’t even talk about Republicans or their policies, they just namedrop trump then blame leftists for all their woes.

          “MoVe ThE oVeRtOn WiNdOw (even though they openly and pointedly snipped completely off anything left of mid right genocide Joe)”

          The answer is guillotines and anyone who says otherwise are well off liberals who would rather have Trump than redistribute wealth and resources.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I said “we need to vote for candidates that don’t just look out for rich people.”

    • bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Overton window is not something that can be changed electorally. Candidates can only get on the ballot in the first place if they’re within the Overton window, as anybody outside the window is “radical” or “extreme”, and the existing political powers forbid their candidacy. The electoral window is moved outside the electoral process, and only then can the electoral system permit new candidates with new ideas.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lol yes it can. Why are we having idiotic discussion to disband the EPA? Because Trump won an election. That moved the Overton window, drastically at that. Why can’t Biden do ______? Because the Republicans still have a very real chance of winning. When the GOP has no chance of winning, then the Overton window can move more.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        So… were just ignoring the current candidates? And the current debates and policies that each have pushed?

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Meanwhile, the Overton window has been shifting right radically. Seems like this lesser of two evils nonsense is actually doing the opposite of what you claim.

      • someguy3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Moved because Trump won an election. But you want to suggest that’s just random? C’mon.

        *Btw it’s moving the Overton window, not lesser of two evils as you want to put it. You want policy number 426? You have to vote for policy 1 first. You have to walk before you can run.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          What are you talking about? We have been moving rightward ever since the Clinton administration, baring a handful of social issues. Are you genuinely telling me that we are more left leaning now than we were under the new deal politics before Reagan?

          All we’ve progressed in is gay and civil rights, which is good. Economically and by most other metrics, we’ve slid Faaaaar to the right.

          It’s not a good look for your position on slow incremental change that the entire apparatus can collapse in one election.

          • someguy3@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            You said radical, that was Trump. You think Clinton change was radical? No that was Trump. Can’t forget Bush either! You know the one that lied his way into war. But you want to suggest everything was all Clintons fault or something? C’mon be better than this weird game you’re playing. Like really, do you think it would be more right or more left without Bush and Trump? That’s the Overton window.

            BTW Clinton had to be moderate because he was going against an incumbent.

            Yeah I could go over different issues, but you’re already trying to poopoo them away. So I’ll broadly address economics with we have regulated capitalism. One party wants to remove regulation (Gop because I think you’re trying to be obtuse) and be entirely free for all, no EPA or anything. And one wants proper regulation (again, Dems because think you’re trying to be obtuse).

            And because or your silly weird games, I’m out.