• pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you had not plugged your metaphorical ears and doubled down on an ad hominem, you would have seen that some of those receipts are self-reported filings from PETA themselves to the government.

    I would link the definition of “ad hominem” for you, but let’s be real: you’re not going to read that either.

    • WamGams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      It is an ad hominem to point out that like PETA, you are responsible for the death of animals?

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s an ad hominem to assert that I hold an unethical belief and then use said assertion to bolster your point.

        I said PETA are psychopaths for needlessly killing animals, yet you assume that I’m not equally against killing animals for personal pleasure and consumerism.

        • WamGams@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do you eat animals?

          If so, that means you give money to animal murderers and that animals die for your benefit.

          I apologize if you are vegetarian or vegan, but if so, when did you begin defending animal AG propaganda websites from being questioned?

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            No offense intended to vegetarians, but it’s a half measure if they’re doing it for ethical or climate reasons.

            I genuinely do not care about that website; all that matters is their receipts. I care that PETA are hypocrites who needlessly kill living creatures while preaching about the ethics or lack thereof of needlessly killing living creatures.

            • WamGams@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              6 months ago

              Killing for sensory pleasure isn’t needless in your book?

              Surely euthanasia is less needless than your personal reasons for involvement in animal murder, wouldn’t you say?