• bamboo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The terrorism and terrorist labels are already selectively applied by people in power in a way that means little more than “people we don’t like”. Take for example how the west don’t consider organizations like the IDF terrorists, but do consider Hamas to be terrorists, despite their activities being widely protected under international law. Or consider how Yemen’s government has had the label applied and removed based on concessions given to the US.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree that those labels are flippantly defined but Hamas (while having a political wing) definitely has a terrorist wing. Palestinians deserve defending but Hamas isn’t worth your breath.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not trying to imply a moral judgement here over whether or not Hamas is good or not. All I’m claiming is that as an indigenous group resisting foreign occupation, Hamas’ activities, including armed resistance, are protected under international law. And that the west considers them terrorists despite this shows that not violating international law itself isn’t grounds to be considered a terrorist or not. The point is the distinction is purely whether the west likes them or not.