• JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You ignored data twice, and then I agreed that past 30 is a higher risk pregnancy. No idea what you are talking about friend.

    I then provided info that shows women werent always marrying as young as people tend think which goes against your basis that evolution supports teens being in their reproductive prime. You haven’t supplied any data at all to back up your claims.

    But you do you. The info is out there for you and others. Have a nice day now

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      You ignored data twice

      I addressed all of the data you provided, even asking for further clarification for one of the sources. You just hand-waved my point, with data, away. Even now trying to claim that I didn’t provide it. And you’re accusing me of ignoring data. Lol Just another projection. You’re good at doing this.