• brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Okay, I’m all for good, complete education, but blaming people not understanding media on “too much STEM” is a bit ridiculous.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I dunno. Math asks me to just accept it’s normal to have 60 watermelons and is trying move bulk orders of melons on a regular car. The goal is to figure out the problem and not accept that the person who is a wholesale watermelon dealer in denial is commiting tax evasion.

      Or to discover that the melon seller has a regular job in ag and gets a bunch of melons on the side from the field and sells the harvest at cost to make up the part of their paycheck that was paid in perishable food.

      Should we shame the seller for breaking the law or sympathize for being forced into that situation? People don’t have the energy to care; they just came for a maths question.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sorry, dude, what you said must have been very interesting, but at some point I just stopped reading to optimize a watermelon workflow instead. Weird.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        but… this is not the math you see at STEM, this is the math you see at high school at best. There’s no deeper meaning in actual STEM math problems, they are way too abstract or specific. There’s no watermelons, it’s just some a, b, n1, nk… maybe some physics formulas that apply to velocity, mass… I read 0 problems in my uni math and physics courses where they used real world examples.

        I see your point but that’s for high schoolers, not STEM students or alumnus.