• halendos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Not really, AMD’s FSR upscaling can increase visual quality/fidelity while using less power than rendering at full resolution. This can be easily seen in Steam Deck’s battery life improvement when enabling it. Scaling this to millions of devices can indeed reduce energy usage.

      When you read about “AI power consumption”, its mostly about training the models, not as much the usage after it’s trained.

        • SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          FSR in this case doesn’t need to be trained more. It’s already a complete dataset, so now it can be released to run on MILLIONS of devices and reduce their load. And then you knock railroads which are one of the most efficient forms of land transportation we have. Just full of bad takes here.

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, I’m saying you are fundamentally misunderstanding what technology they’re talking about and are thinking every type of AI is the same. In this article she is talking about graphics AI running on the local system as part of the graphics pipeline. It is less performance and therefore power intensive. There is no “vast AI network” behind AMDs presumptive work on a competor to DLSS/frame generation.