• Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    5 months ago

    Respect to the computer scientist who sorted that out. That has got to be an extremely satisfying bug to fix.

    • tabris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a software engineer, I’m still trying to figure out their build pipeline. That thing has got to be interesting.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        No documentation, imagine! The original designers–dead. This person had to reverse engineer every aspect of that system, though I can’t imagine that it has more than, say, 64KB of RAM. Still an enormous amount of work but not like trying to figure out how an iPhone works without any documentation.

        • palordrolap@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/news/voyager-mission-anniversary-computers-command-data-attitude-control/

          According to the above, the software was written in FORTRAN.

          There’s probably at least one warehouse somewhere full of green bar sprocketed teletype / dot matrix paper with the source code on it, if not also magnetic tapes. And that assumes they haven’t archived it in other places and formats in the last ~50 years.

          70kB though. That’s a huge amount of memory for 1977. Low-end personal computers were still selling with less than that 10 years later.

          That said, the article doesn’t distinguish ROM and RAM, so I wonder how much of that is ROM. ROM is and was far cheaper.

          Also, that 70 might be a rounding up of 65536 bytes, which is 64k, so you might be spot on with your guess there.