• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Sure, when you can force the workforce to do a thing, that thing tends to get done. But they’ll probably do it slower than if they chose to do it. So other things will suffer if they force a certain initiative.

    And that’s what we saw in the USSR. Certain initiatives progressed well (space program, nuclear program, etc), while others suffered (food production, basic manufacturing, etc).

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sure, when you can force the workforce to do a thing,

      Yeah… turns out that homelessness is a great motivator.

      But they’ll probably do it slower than if they chose to do it.

      Soooo… just like wage slaves, eh?

      food production, basic manufacturing

      After 1947 there was no great problems with food production in the USSR. Still… you’re not really wrong. The capitalist mode of production does offer a feedback system for consumer goods - even though it’s a pretty terrible one that only works as long as the capitalists have to compete for a well-paid populace’s buying power.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If I recall correctly the USSR was a pretty steady grain importer throughout their history

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          As far as I’m aware, the USSR started importing grain in the 60s - primarily to feed livestock as meat became a regular thing for Soviet citizens.