Meta has said it will expand its hate speech policy to cover more uses of the word “Zionist” when applied to Jews or Israelis on its platform.

We will now remove messages targeting ‘Zionists’ in several areas where our investigation has shown that the term tends to be used to refer to Jews and Israelis, with dehumanising comparisons, calls to harm, or denials of existence," the company said in a press release on Tuesday.

In December, Human Rights Watch said that Meta was guilty of “systemic censorship of Palestine content” during Israel’s war on Gaza.

  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 months ago

    Also denial of the existence of israel is now forbidden in Germany and on Meta platforms. Free speech btw.

    Maybe it’s just me, but calling for the eradication of a country is bad (controversial take, I know)

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        I agree, but not a Palestine that occupies 100% of Israel.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Israel is not a country.

          If israel wants to exist it can accept a two state solution with Palestine right now.

          You do not get to decide whether a colony is a country. The natives do.

          Saying israel is a country is similar to saying Crimea is actually Russian.

          • CybranM@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Is the US a country? Is Australia a country? I doubt the natives decided they were. Very weird way to define a country, regardless of your thoughts on Israel / Palestine

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Israel is not a country.

            OK I’m done with this conversation, lmao. Didn’t have to scratch your surface very much for the full-on hate to come out. Interesting how that happens so often with people who profess to simply be anti-zionist.

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Recognition of israel comes from Palestinians not from posturing hypocrites.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Thanks for the explanation, person who believes Jews are not native to Israel:

                You do not get to decide whether a colony is a country. The natives do.

                Definitely not a ragingly anti-Semitic opinion there, nope! Edit: same for the downvoters too. You all need to take a step back and re-examine your views. Jews have lived there for 3000 years.

                • filister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Could you remind me how this turned out in most of America historically? And here by America I mean both North and South America.

                  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Can you rephrase this question? I have no idea what you’re asking.

                • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So have Muslims and Christians. Doesn’t give them the right to kill all the other people and take their land. Not to mention everything they do to encourage settler colonialism, like giving settlers a free pass from Europe or the US to come in and take homes from natives in the area. You can find so many examples of random people from Germany or New York who show up and are given a house that belonged to some Palestinian family for generations.

                  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    So have Muslims and Christians. Doesn’t give them the right to kill all the other people and take their land.

                    So your solution is to dissolve the state of Israel and leave the Jews there at the mercy of neighbours who would take their land and kill them on sight? Big brain time

                    The history of Israel’s formation is not relevant to today’s discussion. Most countries were founded on colonialism and war and oppression; it doesn’t mean the solution is “well actually let’s send everyone packing”

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Calling for the eradication of a religious ethnostate that engages in genocide and colonialism is surprisingly a good thing.

      Or do you think it was bad the world eradicated Nazi Germany?

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s an excellent historical analogy — too bad you’ve misunderstood it. Germany was not dissolved after WW2, and its population was not thrown to the wolves. We only replaced their government. I agree that Likud needs to go (ideally to the Hague) but the people here wanting to wipe the country from the map are dangerous lunatics.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          The countries of East and West Germany would like a word with you. The state of Nazi Germany very clearly ceased to exist.

          • cygnus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            The division was because the winners couldn’t coexist, not because Germany inherently needed to be split. The whole thing could have been treated like West Germany.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, the division was because the winners couldn’t agree on who gets to build a new country where the old one was.

              No one was going to leave the Nazi state in power.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                The division was because the winners couldn’t coexist,

                No, the division was because the winners couldn’t agree on who gets to build a new country where the old one was.

                Sounds to me like we’re in agreement here? In any case, the Allies didn’t give have Poland annex German territory or whatever. It continued to exist. Lots of people in this thread on the other hand want to delete Israel altogether and give it all to Palestine (which, incidentally, has never been a state at any point in history)

                • Deceptichum@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Why would the Allies give German land to a Soviet puppet state of Poland?

                  You know what they did? They gave it back to the people living there, so let’s give Israel back to the people who lived there, that is the majority the Palestinians.

                  The Israelis can be like White South Africans, stay or fuck off, it’s not important.

                  • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    You know what they did? They gave it back to the people living there, so let’s give Israel back to the people who lived there, that is the majority the Palestinians.

                    The Israelis can be like White South Africans, stay or fuck off, it’s not important.

                    Holy fuck. I’m going to be charitable and assume you’re just unaware of history, and not a full-blown Nazi. You know Palestinians and Mizrahi Jews are the same people, right?