The Trump campaign may have violated United State copyright law by selling merchandise featuring the former president’s mugshot, legal experts have warned.

    • tmyakal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Publicly funded” doesn’t mean “publicly owned.” Plenty of states give grants and tax incentives to film productions to entice them to work there. That’s tax dollars going into a copyrighted work.

      And being of a public figure has absolutely no bearing on copyright. If it did, paparazzi wouldn’t exist, because they wouldn’t be able to effectively sell their photos.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Copyright of a photo doesn’t belong with the subject. The photographer owns it.