

This is why when you get permission, where you must plan for a decade of work, and they are saying yes, you get them to say in perpetuity and non-revokeable.
This is why when you get permission, where you must plan for a decade of work, and they are saying yes, you get them to say in perpetuity and non-revokeable.
So you don’t really want to archive in the technical sense, you want it offline for security, which is valid but extremely inconvenient for regular end users.
Warranty… Some are 15-20 years, but you need proof of purchase docs, which are often emailed data.
You have a house and 5 people on 60k in Chicago… That’s crazy
Just the bullshit they fed everyone to cover up the bullshit ending. People argue this point as if it makes any difference in the quality at all, but it doesn’t.
It would be, if it were comprehensive and applicable to match making, but I don’t think for most people that can be gleaned from fedi. Most people only lurk, few even directly follow communities, and the content people do interact with likely does not represent them well unless they put themselves out there like that.
Just like match and okc you’d have to take a quiz and match against core values. Social media data mining would be a terrible way of matching.
Aside from some over the counter numbing creams and surgery there is nothing to be done by a doctor anyway. At best you can massage it gently in a shower or bath. You didn’t say how long you’ve had it, but it takes weeks to reduce. Just tell them if you feel you must, there is no magic way to say embarrassing things except for practice doing so.
I think most in this thread are missing the point. It’s not really about specific knowledge, it’s about day to day existence and entertainment. The average person isn’t deep diving any topic, but nevertheless seeking the next dopamine hit becomes harder and harder and you’ve seen every core day to day thing by like age 20 which you must then rehash for another 60 years. I get the sentiment.
These are cybertruck owners…
It won’t keep track of my place in a Playlist to resume so I trashed it.
Which TMS you in bruh? That universe of data is bat shit crazy.
Yeah so I could show up to class just to listen to the chucklefuck prof rewrite what I just read and be bored out of my mind
What’s the point… It’s a bespoke device with bespoke software. Render at native…
Think of some other animal then. Are you fond of anything but also don’t want to fuck them? The horny libido light just never turns on.
I believe it should be possible to use cryptography to have the validator provide a key to the reviewer, and for the reviewer to sign the review with their key and the validator key, in such a way that a validator can validate a signed message used their key so is valid, but cannot know which reviewer it was. See Yang et. al. 2006 anonymous signature schemes in public key cryptography journal.
All W2s should come with an anonymous review sheet, but you still need a centralized validator.
A context aware interpolation with less overhead is a cool technology as compared to context unaware averaging. How that ends up implemented in various engines is a different topic.
They got revokeable permission apparently.