It should be taught in school, and tested. You shouldn’t be able to graduate without basic emotional intelligence.

So?

Nice. I hope they get the full 250M, and the game back.

“But it’s still mostly the same team, please give us the benefit of the doubt 😭😭😭😭”

Don’t be stupid, don’t buy from a publisher before the 1.0 release

deleted by creator

Assuming prusaslicer, go to print speed settings, and look for “slow down on overhangs”. Also, under filament > cooling, there’s an option to increase fan speed on overhangs.

You can use the top left menu on the layer view to check that the fan and print speed are actually adapting properly to the overhangs.

The social media revolution and its consequences…

Btw, John Romero was the lead designer for Doom, Wolfenstein 3D, and Quake. He’s basically one of the inventors of the FPS genre. Way to go, Microsoft…

Why do you need the benefit of the doubt? Just release a good game, and people will play it, simple as.

You read articles in the shower?

Yeah, if the nozzle is hitting the part, then it’s very likely a cooling issue. If an steep overhang isn’t cooled properly, it’ll curl upwards.

Either you’re printing too hot, or the fan is too slow or failing. For PLA, you can leave the fan at 100% after the first or second layer, and print between 195 and 205°C. Printing too fast also means the fan may struggle with the amount of hot plastic.

Can you paste your slicer settings?

“Developers” are the ones who are passionate about the games they make, and definitely don’t want their games dead.

“Corporations” are the ones who only want to profit from selling the game, and then ditch it once it’s no longer lucrative enough.

Lower the Z offset. Not by too much, or it’ll scratch the bed.

“Everything is failing” is not useful info at all. Post a video of the failure happening if you don’t know how to describe it.

Any videos of when the print fails? Is it all prints or just the Benchy? Does it always fail at the same height?

From the available info, I’d guess it got knocked off the bed because the nozzle hit the curled overhang, which indicates the first layer is too high, decreasing adhesion, and the fan is not blowing enough, so the overhangs don’t cool enough, which allows them to curl upwards and get in the way of the nozzle.

More info = better diagnosis.

V for Vendetta missed the time frame by maybe a decade or two, not much more than that.

Yeah, fuck that town that elected a dog as the mayor, I guess?

Yes, I understood exactly what you said because, as I said before, it’s not hard to understand, it’s just badly formulated.

Natural science is amoral, a jaguar doesn’t care that a gazelle is pregnant when hunting it, since neither of them know what morality is. Scientific research is not naturally moral or immoral, it’s instance dependant. You wouldn’t call Volta immoral for stacking zinc and copper to make a battery, and you wouldn’t think twice before calling Unit 731 immoral.

You don’t get to make a normative claim, wrap it in a false equivalence between human constructs, like scientific research and morality, and the moral independency of natural science, word it inches away from historical fascist research ideals, and then complain when people fill in the blanks in the most plausible way. If you wanted a real discussion, you could’ve developed, from the start, on what you mean, and worded it better. But you didn’t, you’re just rage baiting.

You could’ve said “science is unethical by nature”, or “science is, by nature, unethical”, with commas. Those would be well formulated sentences, which would be easier to read and make sense of.

About the questions: do you oppose all ethical guidelines in science? Are there any you’re fond of? Or should science be completely unimpeded, regardless of who it damages, or what purpose it serves? Can you give any examples?

As I said, very questionable.

It’s not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it’s just very questionable.

If you think religion is the only reason to be a good person, you need therapy.