As fentanyl addiction and overdose deaths ravage Native American communities, some tribal leaders want Indian law enforcement to take drug enforcement more into their own hands.
“We can’t wait anymore,” Jamie Azure, chairman of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, told the Senate Indian Affairs Committee in November. “We are very close to losing a generation to an opioid, to a synthetic drug.”
Tribal leaders testified about an insufficient response by state and federal law enforcement to the drug traffickers who bring fentanyl onto reservations. Azure said his tribe was moving ahead with its own “tribal drug task force.”
But tribal law enforcement is limited in what it can do. Because of the landmark 1978 Supreme Court ruling Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe, tribal courts are not allowed to prosecute non-American Indians for most crimes — including drug trafficking.
That’s actually what a good headline looks like. It presents what happened without being biased towards one side (in this case the US federal & state government vs tribal government).
How about not using the term Indian in the title in the 21st century. I understand its not as taboo down there as it is up here, but at least use American Indian. Before clicking through to read more I assumed it was about people from India.
Yeah, I’m from Europe and still got confused,
Not saying you’re wrong, but – it turns out that more people with indigenous North American heritage prefer to be called “Indians,” followed by “Native Americans,” and then “Other.” I still think “Native Americans” is the best general term, but even that papers over the vast array of different indigenous nations on the continent.
The groups involved are the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Senate Committee of Indian Affairs. Insofar as I know they still call them Indian reservations as well.
Fully agree that things should change (and in the article they call them Native Americans.) but at present the naming is in line with current conventions.