• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It never would have had the Fidelity or capability to be useful in any meaningful way though. Apple just made interesting stuff. IBM had touchscreen Windows machines in 1995, but nobody would bother writing an article about that because it’s useless and boring.

    IBM also made the ‘Simon’ as the first Smartphone in the early 90’s, but it was terrible. Apple Newton as well. There’s a reason things don’t become commercially viable, though they are near.

    • WiseMoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, watch the video. This wasn’t done by Apple. It was modded by ELO, a company which is still around today. They made it for shopping centre payment stations and other similar use cases. And frankly, from the looks of it in the video, it worked just as well as they do today (which is to say mediocre at best).

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Resistance touchscreens have been around for a long time.

      Capacitive touchscreens weren’t commercially viable until the early-mid 00s. Apple literally stole the UI and design patterns from other companies to do their stuff. E.G. See the money they still pay to Creative Labs.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Touch screen computers also don’t make sense ergonomically. There’s a lot more arm and hand movement on a touchscreen compared to even a mouse, so you’ll get tired quicker.

      • SatyrSack@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is why fast food cashiers are passing out constantly. Moving your arms around is just too tiring.

        • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference in ergonomics between sitting at a desk and reaching up vs. standing over a display and tapping down are quite different.

      • chaircat@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see a lot of people online saying this kind of thing, though I gotta wonder if it’s mostly old people who can’t adapt new paradigms.

        I would never buy a computer without touch anymore. The thing the ergonomics argument misses is just because you have touch doesn’t mean you can’t use a mouse (or touchpad) also when it makes more sense. Tiredness is never an issue for me.

        There are some things that are just infinitely more natural with touch, using an electronic device that lacks touch just feels like using incredibly outdated technology to me now.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The headline is more breathless than the story (what else is new?).

      The prototype was put together by ELO, an Apple value added reseller focused on informational and ordering kiosks. No one would have expected this to be usable for general PC stuff.