• CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    100% depends on who’s performing. I’ve driven 500 miles for a festival, but probably wouldn’t for a single artist/one night show.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The concert? I dunno it’s pretty close. But the company to go to the show with, that I’ll fly across the country for.

    When I was living in California, I had a friend text me he had an extra ticket to a Bad Religion concert in Chicago. So I booked a flight and went to see the show with him. Flight was a few hundred bucks, the “free” ticket was worth like $35.

    Honestly, it was totally worth it. One of the best concerts I’ve been to, probably because of who I got to see it with.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I have to rent a car, it’s too far.

    If I have to take an intercity bus, it’s too far.

    An intercity train ride over three hours is also too far.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m two hours from three major cities. For any major concert I must drive 2 hours. No more, no less

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Given how expensive they’re getting, the fees, the ever painfully louder volume, any travel is too much.

    However, when concerts weren’t as anti-fan ….

    • longest trip: from Boston to Florida for a weekend
    • second longest: from Boston to Buffalo
    • most: 1-3 hr
  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll do 3 hours to Chicago if it’s someone really good, but going to shows isn’t really my bag anymore and crowds really get my hackles up so generally I just stay home

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    At a certain distance, the concert is less the event and more a reason to plan a vacation around going to the concert.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    It depends entirely on the band, my budget, and time. One that tours regularly, that I’ve seen before and can see again, probably only an hour, hour-and-half. One that’s not from this country, or I’ve never seen and they’re likely not going to tour anymore, or it’s a really unique show? I’m more willing to travel far, potentially even another country or continent if I can afford it. The farther I go the more I want to make a big trip of it: at least a weekend if not even a week or more if I were going to Europe or something. The closest I’ve come to that, though, was making a long weekend to Washington, D.C. during the cherry blossom festival to see Muse. That was about a 4 hour drive away.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Two hours is my maximum unless I’m going to stay the weekend. I went to a New Pornographers show where people had flown in from Chicago to. Toronto and driven four hours from Michigan to see them. This was right between Delta and Omicron so I think people were super eager to go to anything at all, but I was surprised.

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Farthest i’ve gone is London to Berlin - but I had a few days in a few other cities on the way . . . so maybe that doesn’t count.

    More normally 2-3 hours so I can go after work and be back in bed by say 1-2 a.m. Sometimes i’d stay over in a hostel and get the first train back - but same distance really.