• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    I honestly don’t find any number rating especially useful.

    What I have found useful is to follow 3 or 4 specific movie critics, get to know their opinions and contrast them with my own. We’re never going to agree on every movie, but at least I’ll know why they liked or didn’t like it as a way to figure out if it’s worth my time.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 days ago

      They’re about general critic and public sentiment.
      And for that, no movie should ever get a perfect 10. No movie could ever get a perfect 10.
      They are useful for evaluating a movie’s actual quality. But quality has nothing to do with any individuals enjoyment of a movie.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        They are useful for evaluating a movie’s actual quality.

        Sometimes. When they don’t get brigaded. Movies that star women and minorities or, heaven forbid, queer people bizarrely tend to have much lower scores on the IMDB than movies that star heteronormative white men.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        Currently- Richard Roeper (Chicago Sun-Times), Justin Chang (L.A. Times) and J. Hoberman (Village Voice), although admittedly these days since I just sail the high seas most of the time, I often just go by the description and turn it off if I don’t like what I’m watching.

        I used to know older critics better though. I was usually able to figure out whether or not a movie was worth watching by paying attention to Roger Ebert, Leonard Maltin and Pauline Kael (if she liked it, I probably wouldn’t).