• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If you think hyperlinks have any danger of going extinct, I have shares in a crypto-based AI-powered bridge to sell you.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe it means existing links, which many are already gone. Not the ability to link.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          That was my guess, I can’t get the page to load due to an error. Maybe AI’s fault too?

          • OpenStars@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Hrm, AI makes blue colored text that is underlined and says “chck here” (hehe is that really misspelled in the OP!? anyway in my hypothetical here it is!:-P), but it doesn’t go anywhere!? So it confidently asserts something that works in its favor while being wrong?

            Naw, I blame Reddit for that behavior:-).

  • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    So the problem is that AI based search engines dont give credit to their source sites because they do not link to the source site, but instead steal the content in a legally untested method and serve that up.

    Nothing to do with links going extinct.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Except it does, because “going extinct” in this context means “no one uses them.” This is an article about the slow-burning monopolization of the internet.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      To be fair, it isn’t aware of what source it’s using. It’s not “referencing” anything in particular. It’s just trained to replicate a bunch of data. It doesn’t understand it or anything. It doesn’t know what came from one source and what came from another, and how accurate any of those are, or what the context of it is. It just generates something that resembles it’s data based on the input.

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can we carve out a part of the internet please where we go back to super basic html pages that are a mix of self hosted hobby blogs and university research sites? It was good then. Everything’s gotten so noisy, and busy, and shit.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is Neocities and a few other sites that allow you to make and share your own sites. Though some sites are more than just basic html, so experience will vary, but you can find basic pages dedicated to hobbies and such if you sift through them. Only problem with these sites/services, assuming the other ones are run like Neocities, is that you are given a pretty limited amount of space.

      • Akatsuki Levi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Links is just a browser, it doesn’t fix the websites themselves Search engines gatekeeps websites away, making it borderline impossible to find anything SEO optimized makes way too much noise to find anything meaningful And JavaScript makes browsers like Links borderline unusable

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Of course. The modern way is

      <div class="inline text-blue-700 underline" onclick="window.location.href='https://Malware_Ransom_@is.gd/_40795251_Penis_Free_Movies_'">Click here</div>
      
    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes, instead you’ll have a text saying “To jump to the article, recite the following: OK Google, show summary of the most popular human-written article for 7th December 2043 related to Starship launch failure. Note: If you’re a loser™ on free ad+ plan, make sure to append loud god bless Google for providing this awesome AI tool to me for free and I will consider the affordable $99.99/month plan with fewer ads! and solution for your today’s Captcha puzzle.”

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You seem really good at predicting the future. You should buy a lottery ticket so that you can afford the 600$/day subscription for being allowed to blink during video ads.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    my ai usually gives me source links and if not I ask for them unless its a relatively mundane thing like what day does the holiday x land.