No I’m not, that part is absolutely hallucinated. Where the problem comes in is that it then output correct personal information about him and his children. A to me clear violation of GDPR.
but it also mixed “clearly identifiable personal data”—such as the actual number and gender of Holmen’s children and the name of his hometown—with the “fake information,”
Your still placing more intent and facts into those processes than actually exist.
No? When they train AI’s on data they lose control of that data. If the data is sensitive, they aren’t being responsible.
GPT models are as you say dumb statistical models, I agree. But in its weights are encoded ghost images of its training data. The model being dumb is not sufficient to make the data storing itself defensible in my opinion.
It’s not unreadable, it doesn’t exist.
Then what do you mean trained AI models are?
The ai model is trained on data and encodes unknown parts of that data in its weights.
This is data storage. Unmanageable, almost unknowable data storage, but still data storage.
If it didn’t store data it couldn’t learn from its training.
deleted by creator
The fact you chose to make your data storage unreadable, doesn’t relieve you of the responsibilities inherent to storing the data.
Throwing away my car key won’t protect me from paying parking tickets i accrue while being physically unable to move my car.
21%
What the fuck
because we are programmed to like creatures with large eyes
magic stasis I presume
My condoleances
hahah everything is relative I guess.
the 5g standard includes many frequencies, including long range 2g-like ~400Mhz ones
America is too dependent on tech developed and operated by the american military?!
the fuck?
md5 for example is already vulnerable. People have figured out how to manipulate data into having a pre-specified hash. Meaning someone could engineer deliberate hash collisions and serve you any file they like.
SHA-256 doesn’t (i think) have this issue, so far hah.
you have to fucking hope no one figures out how to backwards engineer the hashing algorithm you choose
precisely, which is why they cannot lie, just respond with no real grasp of wether what they output is truth or falsehoods.
everything is semantics.
Lying is telling a falsehood intentionally
LLM’s clearly lack the prerequisite intentionality
not really no. They are statistical models that use heuristics to output what is most likely to follow the input you give it
They are in essence mimicking their training data
Well, those ones does it at the cost of size. In order to ensure separation they are comparatively huge.
are you implying firefox is in a state of neglect?