• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Mods are sad that this isn’t reddit where their communities are their own little fiefdom

    • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      As I understand, It was a move intended to inspire discussion rather than having overreaching moderators knee-jerk remove posts/comments. It just wasn’t worded properly.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah. Like, I do understand 100% that if someone says something in good faith, even if it’s disagreeable or stupid, and not harmful, is there really a point in removing it? Although , even then, I got banned from politicalhumor for “racism” for posting the following meme:

        1000060888

        It was in a comment section and my joke was that Joe Biden legalised abortion. However they must have thought that I was posting it unrionically and was seriously claiming that Obama was a Muslim based on him being black, even though that it should be obvious that even the creator of the meme was parodying Facebook grandmothers

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m pretty sure you should have been allowed an appeal. I believe it’s a “bylaw” of lemmy. Next time you feel you’ve had a comment unfairly removed or you’ve been banned for something you feel wasn’t worthy of a ban, reach out to a moderator of that community and just ask.

          We’re not Reddit. Sometimes, misunderstandings happen.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Tankie mods on world are criticized for being too tankie in moderation.

    Admins try to address this by forcing mods to argue instead of immediately ban if something is posted against their beliefs.

    A non-tankie mod thinks it is bullshit that they have to engage in every online argument in good faith and takes their subs (I know this isn’t the official term but it communicates the idea) dark in protest.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        To be honest for people who didn’t use redet a lot, ‘subs’ is very confusing because it doesn’t relate to anything in the Threadyverse.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          The term “podcast” was coined by Ben Hammersley, a BBC journalist and The Guardian columnist, in February 2004. The word is a combination of “iPod” and “broadcast”. Hammersley first used the term in an article for The Guardian.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Like seriously what would be the connection if it wasn’t the iPod?

            Yeah, “pod” cast, like podracing, you know star wars? Like your car is a pod. So like you cast it directly to your car and it’s like podracing cast pod.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      fucking tankies are here to ruin yet another alternative social network. Every. Single. Time. Be it alt-right nuts or alt-left ruining the party for everyone.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      While I don’t agree with the ‘tankie’ rhetoric (it’s been thrown around so much that word has no meaning here), mod abuse has definitely gotten out of control across most online communities.

      It’s opening up an opportunity for communities that don’t tolerate mod abuse to flourish.

      The mods only have themselves to blame. Hopefully these new communities won’t repeat the same mistakes.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is going to be a learning experience for mods and admins on Lemmy. It took years for Reddit to cobble together a governance structure and, even then, it was really bad. I haven’t seen the devs take any stance on building tools to help and we’ve seen a lot of cases where mod abuse have been defended by admins.

        This seems to be a first stab at admins taking a proactive approach to mod abuse. It is a bad policy, but at least they seem like they are trying to do something.

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Why are right wingers the only ones who ever try to devalue the meaning of words?

        If they don’t like being called tankies or nazis they are free to chage their beleifs, same as you if you feel like you are being grouped in for your beliefs.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, this proves my point.

          I’m not a tankie, nor am I a right-winger.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not that it matters, the whole .world instance is a toxic disinformation hub that should have been defederated long ago by every sane instance, but from what I’ve read it wasn’t tankies, in this case, it was vegan fundamentalists going on a ban spree (it’s far from the first time their .world community causes drama).

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t have a .world account. I’m commenting on lemmynsfw, which hasn’t defederated .world yet, so I got this question on my feed and my replies are getting sent back to .world through federation.

          • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ya bud, I understand federation. I’m just saying, you’ve commented about how much you hate .world in this thread six times, which is a lot of times, and 99% of your interactions are on .world. It’s incredibly easy to block an instance and never see it again.

                • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  People are free to make an account on .world of they want to.

                  But that doesn’t mean that cancers like .world or .ml shouldn’t be excised before they kill the rest of the fediverse. Disinformation should never be tolerated.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Vegan fundamentalists.

          Veganism is a perfectly cromulent diet choice as long as you take care to supplement any vitamins and aminoacids your diet may lack and you don’t force it on growing children or obligate carnivore pets.

          The problem with the mods in .world’s vegan community, is that they don’t treat it as a personal diet choice, but as a cult. And their view of “heretics” seems directly inspired by Warhammer 40,000.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    You have to allow a little raw chicken in the mayo now.

    So now people are to be allowed to sealion and troll and JAQ off in your community, so long as they do it respectfully.

    Or else.

    Imagine running, say, a community for vulnerable trans kids, and being forced to allow a constant influx of ‘helpful suggestions’, just so long as they’re phrased in pretty language.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Anyone who’s seen what happens when mods legitimize trolls knows it kills communities. I wish i could have stayed on blahaj but it’s just as toxic as reddit lgbtq spaces now…

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Imagine running, say, a community for vulnerable trans kids, and being forced to allow a constant influx of ‘helpful suggestions’, just so long as they’re phrased in pretty language.

      What will happen is Trans kids will go over to one of the trans-friendly instances, and the .world will be where the trans defenders go to debate chuds.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      We’re going to allow some “flat earth” comments. We’re going to force some moderators to accept some “flat earth” comments

      You… like this? Glad I’m not a mod, this is how places like Reddit became what they are today. Opinions should be allowed, but admins should be able to moderate blatant falsehoods.

      • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Here’s the thing - who cares if someone wants to post about flat earth theories? If people like it, it will be upvoted, and if they don’t, it will be downvoted. Why remove it? That’s the point - let the users decide, not the mods. Power to the people, the mods just step in when they post 10 times in an hour about flat earth theories.

        Unfortunately, you’ll have to switch to subscriptions when you sort by new.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          Their own example of a “differing opinion” to be discussed (i.e., promoted) instead of banned is flat earth lunacy.

          The policy is intended to promote disinformation and hate speech, as was that bot they shoved on all their communities a while ago.

          .world is and has always been a disinformation hub that should have been defederated by every sane instance from the get go.

          • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Essentially, the policy is to distance .world from other instances that have a more…. Locked down/strict approach. Or in other words, the purpose of the change is to not have .world’s moderation resemble the oppressive methods of moderation of some of the other popular instances.

            Its intention is to stop heavy-handed moderation, and instead create discussion and debate. To not have mods knee-jerk remove/ban content that could have been left to remain and debated. The problem is, it was confusing in its delivery.

            But don’t let this get in the way of whatever grudge you’re holding.

            • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              The purpose is, as .world’s has always been (we all remember the infamous bot), to spread disinformation, though this policy is clearly an escalation in that regard, forcing mods to actively promote it even if they don’t want to.

              At this point no amount of vacuous sophisms can hide that.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Reddit is a living emblem of the problem this is trying to solve so I have no idea what you mean.

        Mods can’t be trusted to enforce the truth. It’s far too complicated and they invariably end up enforcing their own distorted view of the world instead.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        We’ve already run into problems with that where mods banned people talking about Israeli war crimes as “misinformation”. Despite it being headline news.

        So that’s obviously not a great system.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah. I’d rather have people rely on citations and inquisition than trusting mods to keep misinformation at bay.

        • nyamlae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          That saying is total bullshit. I’ve seen people say it for years, only to one day turn coats and reveal that they supported the falsehoods all along.

          Sunlight helps scum find other scum.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      So they’re trying cut back on echo chambers and power tripping mods.

      No they’re not. They’re trying to promote disinformation and hate speech, because they’re trying to emulate Musk, Zuckerberg, and spez, as they’ve always done.

      Hopefully this’ll be the drop that makes the glass overflow and will get .world finally defederated by saner instances.

  • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not an expert in political philosophy by any measure, but I kind of feel like lemmy.world is a small case study in the pros and cons of realpolitik.

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, time to make my alt community account my primary one. See y’all on the other side!

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Seems like they locked the community in protest of recent .world TOS changes. Although I think a much better protest would be to simply refuse to enforce the changes they felt are unsatisfactory.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      They locked the community in protest of . world’s new pro-disinformation and pro-hate speech policies.