Source unknown, some sites assign it to Oppressive Silence comics by Ethan Vincent. But that website in the corner is shady

    • dragonlobster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      In theory black could play poorly and give the queen away by placing it next to the white king, then if the white king takes the black queen it would be a draw. Why would black do such a thing? Well playing poorly also means stalemating your opponent in an obviously winning position, which also happened here.

      You can argue it’s an “obvious win”, just like I could argue if I’m a piece up it’s an “obvious win” for me. But just because it’s obvious doesn’t mean the result is guaranteed to happen.

      Also I guarantee you not everyone can actually checkmate a king with just a queen and king. So in fact it’s not so obvious for a super beginner.

      As for the benefits of the actual mechanism itself, in some positions you can actually force a draw or stalemate where you’d either otherwise be losing, or you are unclear of your advantage. For example in one of my games I was chasing the King around with my Rook where if the king took my rook, it would be stalemate, and if they didn’t take my rook I would keep checking the king (while making sure the distance between my rook and their king is 0).

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I appreciate all of these super in depth responses, but man does it validate my decision to never invest any time into chess lmao.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Never liked that rule. The king should be a capturable piece and be allowed to step into checks. It might make the game harder at a beginner level but it gets rid of the anticlimactic stalemates. It won’t get rid of draws because the repetition rule still applies.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t know anything about chess but I imagine one benefit would be to give the losing player one last opportunity to avoid a loss by being strategic and give the winning player the need to still think about their moves instead of just randomly moving around since they know they will win otherwise.

    • Evolith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “You didn’t win correctly.” - Chess (The original Dark Souls-themed tactical grid-based roguelike war game)

    • Vigge93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      In a competitive setting, it would mean that both players get 0.5 points instead of white getting 0 and black getting 1 points.

    • gloog@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Stalemate rules mean that a player in a heavily disadvantaged position still has the opportunity to play for a draw, whether that comes from their own clever play or a mistake from their opponent (what happened in the comic).