• zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    1 month ago

    Steam is a last bastion of integrity. Given the present timeline, it will probably be bought out by EA.

    • Majorllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gabe has stated several times that as long as he is running things he will never go public and let it get ruined like that.

      Once he’s gone though I suspect steam will sell for 18 quintillion dollars to Microsoft or something.

      It’ll probably go to shit immediately afterwards.

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 month ago

        Really hoping (He probably does) he has a succession plan in place to prevent that when he’s gone

        • Majorllama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I vaguely recall hearing that his son had no interest in running the company but that was also years ago. Hopefully whoever is set to take over when he goes shares his exact same views on keeping the company private.

          Only time will tell.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        And this is why we shouldn’t rely on steam to be the one and only saviour. GoG and pirating is needed so we can make sure we can enjoy our games in the future.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Gog keeps hitting me with admin access requests when I’m not even doing anything on it. Repeatedly. Until I kill the task. Not a fan.

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 month ago

            Because of the DRM free nature of GOG, you do not have to use their GOG Galaxy client.

            You could use a different client (like Heroic) or you could just download the games straight from the GOG website.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gonna get bought by Pepsi and you’ll need to drink the Mt dew verification can to launch it every time

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t think Gabe has any interest in that. He’s so filthy rich, at this point everything is just a hobby paid from change he found under a couch cushion.

      Also: EA cannot afford Valve.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    even when used to assist human creativity

    That’s a bit harsh. AI can be a great tool for assisting creativity.

    finished by a human to be covered under copyright

    That’s so much worse, wtf? airbrushed slop is fine but using it as inspiration, which good luck proving that, isn’t?

    This whole AI thing is fucking cooked.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s okay, the author of the article didn’t actually read (or understand) the Copyright Office’s recommendations. They are:

      Based on an analysis of copyright law and policy, informed by the many thoughtful comments in response to our NOI, the Office makes the following conclusions and recommendations:

      • Questions of copyrightability and AI can be resolved pursuant to existing law, without the need for legislative change.
      • The use of AI tools to assist rather than stand in for human creativity does not affect the availability of copyright protection for the output.
      • Copyright protects the original expression in a work created by a human author, even if the work also includes AI-generated material.
      • Copyright does not extend to purely AI-generated material, or material where there is insufficient human control over the expressive elements.
      • Whether human contributions to AI-generated outputs are sufficient to constitute authorship must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
      • Based on the functioning of current generally available technology, prompts do not alone provide sufficient control.
      • Human authors are entitled to copyright in their works of authorship that are perceptible in AI-generated outputs, as well as the creative selection, coordination, or arrangement of material in the outputs, or creative modifications of the outputs.
      • The case has not been made for additional copyright or sui generis protection for AI- generated content.

      Pretty much everything the article’s author stated is contradicted by the above.

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          It doesn’t read like AI to me, but their takeaways about copyright made me think the author had read an AI summary rather than the actual source material.

          • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It doesn’t read like AI to me,

            i agree at first glance, but being confidently incorrect (especially getting the source material correct but drawing a dead wrong conclusion) is sort of a hallmark of the model.

            a couple years ago i was pretty good at spotting AI work but it does get harder as time goes on.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had been playing some Warzone recently because I hate myself, and I had thought some of the cards and banners seemed fucked up, but most of them also look hand drawn (such as the Black History Month loading screen) so I assumed maybe it was just the style, but now I can’t help but think they’re just AI generated.

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This sounds like something steam would be willing to do. I have no idea if it is, but adding this feature ALONE will ward off a good bit of it, I’d think.

      I was kinda meh about CoD. I stopped after BO2, haven’t had any of them installed or played since it was dead. I didn’t mind its continued existence, but I wasn’t the target anymore.

      But now I would guide a predator middle right on their headquarters and feel no guilt.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, Activision could just lie. I wouldn’t put it past them. And if they get found out blame it on some fall guy.